PRESS RELEASE: Race FaceThe places we come from help guide the places we go. Over twenty five years ago, Race Face was born from the imagination and creativity that shaped the wildest features of Vancouver’s North Shore. An idea was unearthed on trails that made us feel alive. A challenge. A call to something larger than ourselves.
Here in the playground of the Coast Range, we created a legacy of doing things our way. Cranks crafted in the backroom and proven in the backyard. R&D done every damn day. Every trail delivering a new design tweak. Every moment spent on dirt embedded into the very fiber of our cranks. And we continue to forge towards what is next.
We were raised in these mountains. We still live, work, and dream in this space. Race Face is within spinning distance of B.C.’s best single-track, and we build every Race Face carbon crankset by hand, right here. Where we were born. Introducing the new Race Face Next SL - proudly handcrafted in Vancouver, B.C.
Our trusted and performance-driven Next SL crankset has been refined with improvements in its carbon layup and manufacturing process that delivers an increase in crankarm stiffness for precise power transfer. The strength of the new Next SL crank arms is off the charts while achieving a modest reduction in weight over the previous version. Plus, you can run the new Next SL (and all RF Cinch System cranks) with the Shimano 12 speed drivetrain when using our new Cinch Direct Mount Shimano 12 Speed Compatible 1x ring. The Next SL crankset continues forward as the benchmark for XC + Trail crank performance, a testament to the history of Race Face following its own path, creating industry leading product focused on you, the rider.
With new 12 Speed Shimano Compatible ring or Standard Cinch Direct Mount RingThe Next SL Crankset
FEATURES:• Proven crank arm shape and pedal insert for strong dependable performance
• Improved lightweight carbon lay-up for precise power transfer.
• Cinch System for maximum versatility in drivetrain options
• Crankarms are lighter than previous generations.
• Numerous spindle length options and is Cinch Power Meter compatible.
• Run the Next SL crankset on your 12 speed Shimano drivetrain with our new Cinch Direct Mount 12 Speed Compatible Shimano 1x ring
• Proudly designed, tested and handcrafted in Vancouver, BC using US-sourced carbon.
• Covered by a 3-year warranty
SPECSCOLOUR: Black
BUILT FOR: XC/TRAIL
SIZE: 170, 175MM
BB OPTIONS: BB92, 68/73 BSA, PF30 (across various spindle lengths)
SPINDLE DIAMETER: 30MM
SPINDLE SIZE: 134, 136, 149, 170, 174, 190mm
CHAINLINE: 52mm (136mm Boost spindle / DM Ring)
RING CONFIGURATIONS: Cinch Direct Mount, 64/104mm Cinch Spider
WEIGHT: 428G (32T RING, NO BB)
MSRP: $429.99 USD (crank arms only)
Next SL Website
MENTIONS: @raceface
No issues at all.
RF has been good about warranty replacement, but they kept breaking. Moved on and will never get another RF carbon crank. Not worth the hassle and potential injury for the weight savings IMO. RF Atlas cranks have been going strong, however, for a couple years so I know they can make a good product.
A few months ago the peddle threads came lose (glue failed) on one of the pairs of older SL cranks. Strangely, both crank arms on the same trip. Isent them to Silverfish, the UK distributor on a Thursday. I received a brand new set of Next R cranks arms on the Monday. Can’t fault the customer seviceee.
I’m quite happy that near 3 year old arms were replaced with brand new.
The G4 arms and Next R arms seem a lot more substantial than the original but hopefully these new ones are even better. Although they will probably be 100% more expensive as prices seems to be just going silly...
The new Next SL crankset has seen gains over the past Next SL version in overall strength and insert reliability through improvements in materials and our lay-up process. This is a step forward for Next SL cranks. We understand that some users may have had frustrations with the G4 Next SL and we have set out to address all those concerns with this new Next SL crankset (G5). We always 100% stand behind our product and always are aiming to create mtb products that fuel your passion to ride!
Would love to have been around to see the comments relating to press releases for:
A. Cranbrothers Mallet pedals.
B. RS Reverb
Must have been a hoot.
RF and Sram carbon cranks are notorious for issues mentioned all over this comment sections, just like RF bottom brackets pressfits in general. Carbon is not a good material for making a cransket used for anything else than road and mild XC. Same for the rims. There are all too many pros on EWS circuit switching to alloy for all parts having direct contact with rocks.
Yes there are people riding these for years with no issues just like there are folks who don’t puncture Schwalbe snake skin tyres without inserts. Different terrains, different people.
Call the path in Tusin CA, ask for Mo.
Then you can even get Clavicula cranks and good luvk with these.
.
side note, can you guys may that little cinch screw on the preload a proper size head?
A friend of mine is missing the non drive side crank arm for his G4 so he will probably give me some dollars for mine and I'll buy an alloy crank! lol
I will say that I got 1000's of miles out of two pairs of them with no catastrophic failures (hard riding and I'm 185 lbs) but then both eventually developed a drive side crankarm creak that was unbearable and cost me many hours diagnosing.
Maybe one day I'll pony up and purchase some brand new. Every other RF product I've used I've been happy with.
I had SIX C’s on my plus bike. ( came with the bike)
and no issues there!
Happy to also hear you have great warranty. Happy to buy BC products and support local riding scene. I’ll keep buying your cranks
I do however still ride Next handlebars and have other RF parts scattered about.
Not all completely rosy: a friend has replaced his under warranty, pedal inserts became lose, but @raceface was super responsive.
Next!
1. Regardless of what you perceive as had receiving bad past customer support, when a rep shows up in a forum treat him with respect.
2. Mountain biking is divided into various categories (XC, trail, all mountain, freeride, DH). Outside of XC there is a lot of overlapping but XC is pretty specific - fast, light, and riding mostly on green or blue trails. There is an understanding with using XC components that the price for light weight and speed is having less ability to perform big jumps/hits and "all mountain" or DH type riding. I salute any company attempting to market XC components because the potential for misuse is so high and invites in a huge number of warranty claims from riders that used the components in a different sport - which realistically can never be proven.
3. Speaking of proving a defect, many XC components come with a weight limit for the rider. That's another variable impossible for the manufacturer to determine after a warranty claim has been made.
For the reasons above I think all manufacturers of light weight XC components are taken advantage of many many times over. They try to honor their warranties but more often than not they are screwed by riders that have used their product in a way that it was not intended for.
All for now. Have a great day.
(Wish they'd add the option to delete comments...)
Ok, what about saying "Proven crank arm shape and pedal insert for strong dependable performance"? It's obvious you have a lot of people saying both your Next SL and DH-rated SixC cranks have failed. Saying they are "dependable" sounds like BS/fluff to me given all of the experiences shared here.
Also there's no actual data included in your press release. "improvements in its carbon layup and manufacturing process that delivers an increase in crankarm stiffness for precise power transfer".
That's pretty vague. You could probably get away with saying that, yet changing nothing on the cranks. No numbers, no data, no "we finally fixed them insert issues on the pedal and BB side and here are tests to prove those are more reliable". Just sort of vague hand-wavey stuff.
You’re the same guy above putting SixC cranks on an XC bike hoping for the best, saying stupid shit like “crack arm boots ftw” as if you have any clue about the actual efficacy of crank boots. Keep typing buddy!
I'm not totally against carbon or raceface, the only carbon part on my bike is a raceface sixc bar.
From where I sit as a consumer I don't have much info:
- Some carbon cranks fail, reports of inserts loose. Not just raceface. I have no way of knowing how many, or whether this is an issue with production consistency or a general problem bonding aluminum to carbon.
- A bike shop owner tells me carbon cranks are prone to loose inserts.
- If I buy a pair and they do develop a problem, sounds like people usually are able to get them warrantied -- provided the shop that sold them still is around, the claim is not denied, and I have a spare set of cranks to keep my bike running in the meantime and I'm not injured due to the failure.
Sorry @raceface, there's no info here to help me make an informed choice. Just "the product is better, trust us". I will give it a plus for being an onshore product.
I just bought a new crank. My criteria were:
- Accepts standard chainrings designed for SRAM direct mount (lots of good, cheap options readily available).
- Inexpensive, reliable, available bottom bracket.
- Stiff aluminum construction with reasonable weight. Aluminum with a better tensile strength or steel inserts so the pedal threads last.
I had to compromise, seems like other than Shimano no one is interested in continuing to develop and manufacture aluminum cranks aside from an entry level offering. I guess that's just what people are buying.
Agree they must sell for these companies to keep putting them out. They are noticeably lighter, and I'm sure OEM on a lot of higher-end bikes so it's not even an individual choice in many cases. I think PBers who ride a lot think they are in the norm because they are on PB a lot reading comments from other people that ride (or type about riding) a lot. But in reality I bet most consumers who buy these just don't ride a ton and/or push them much and may ride in flatter areas, but have some dough or aspirations that go unrealized.That's probably a lucrative formula for companies selling expensive, but fragile carbon vs. alum cranks.
It does make you wonder why Shimano hasn't jumped on the $ train here.
But optimistically maybe the "new layup process" does prevent inserts from breaking off. It'll probably be difficult to tell with no data transparency, and even long-term reviews being with one person who gave the Next SL v1 a great review: www.pinkbike.com/news/Race-Face-Next-SL-Cranks-Review-2013.html
...and another who gave the Reverb a great review: "Still, the Reverb's reliability and install-and-forget nature make it our first choice when riders ask us which dropper post they should consider." www.pinkbike.com/news/rockshox-reverb-review-2011.html
If you get rock strikes on the uphill crank arm boots work fine, and if you do it on the downhill it's your own damn fault for putting your foot down.
Maaaaaaaby if you guys weren't so douchy like you guys are in these threads you would get better results with stuff like warantees.
High praise to the two companies that seemingly offered you an EP deal only to sell well before they say so in their terms and conditions. Something smells fishy here me thinks.
Just a bike freak bud, bought the sb130 from competitive cyclist and the ripmo from my local bike shop.. not a fan of the long wheelbase. Currently back on the sb4.5 and ibis mojo
Lol
Your warranty replies are beyond a joke.
I facebooked, instagrammed, emailed everyone I could through the correct channels, sent a courier pigeon and smoke signals when one of your products failed.
Zero replies.
I only got a reply when I commented on a Pinkbike article.
Unprofessional
For a known design fault on your Vault hubs and then you still offer no support.
Sort it out.
Your brand is blacklisted from my life
www.youtube.com/watch?v=poX9Bj6e98k
Dangerous product
Warrant ? Answer was no