Santa Cruz's V10 chassis has been through many iterations since it launched in 2002, but one thing that hasn't changed is how often it claims podium places. The original machine had 26" wheels, a ridiculous 255mm of travel, a 67º head angle, a floating brake arm, and the first version of the Virtual Pivot Point suspension platform. 17 years later, the 2019 model of the V10 offers 27.5" or 29" wheel versions, a 'meager' 215mm of travel, a wide range of sizes and adjustable geometry via flip-chips at the lower shock eyelet and rear axle.
27.5" wheeled bikes are available in S, M and L sizes, while the 29er offers M, L, and XL, this gives a total range of reach from 410mm up to 492mm. Suitably, the chainstay lengths also increase between some sizes and are also adjustable to tune the balance of the bike. After riding a bunch of 29" downhill bikes this year and using different sized test riders on the bikes this makes complete sense; I'm convinced that if you have enough range to ride 29" it's simply more stable, smooth, and easier to ride fast. If you aren't tall enough, it will hold you back, making me question the existence of size Small downhill bikes with huge wheels. Santa Cruz also agree with this, and found that the taller riders gained more benefit from the big wheels in terms of seconds at the race track.
Santa Cruz developed the new V10 as an out-and-out race bike with 29" wheels, that suited all of their current team but also developed the 27.5" version at the same time to suit smaller riders. This is not one frame adapted to fit both sizes, but two separate frames with kinematics adjusted for each wheel size.
Santa Cruz are also launching a 29" downhill version of the Reserve wheelset. These will only be available aftermarket, laced with Syndicate-spec Chris King hubs and carry a lifetime warranty like all of their frames and wheels. Both products should be available to buy in February 2019.
V10 DetailsIntended use: downhill
Travel: 215mm rear / 203mm front
Wheel size: 29" or 27.5" versions
Frame construction: Carbon Fibre
Sizes: 27.5" - S, M, L / 29" - M, L, XL
Frame Price: $3699 USD
Price: S Build - $5999 USD / X01 Build - $8199 USD
santacruzbicycles.com/v10 29" V10 The 29" geometry table, with some modern numbers across the board.
27.5" V10 You'll notice the shorter reach, but shorter chainstays to go with them too.
The V10 will be available in the same two builds and as a frame kit for both wheelsizes
29" DH Reserve Carbon Wheels
We don't have precise details of the Reserve DH wheelset, yet, but what we do know is that they have been developed in conjunction with the Syndicate in 2018. They will only be available as an aftermarket product with one choice of Chris King hubs and a 31mm internal rim width. Like all Reserve wheels they carry a lifetime warranty. Judging by the pricing of other Reserve wheels, these will cost $599 USD per rim, and $2199 USD for the Chris King wheelset.
Reserve DH DetailsIntended use: downhill
Size: 27.5" or 29"
Wheel size: 29" or 27.5" versions
Construction: Carbon Fibre
Width: 31mm internal
Price: $2199 USD
santacruzbicycles.com
Or a rendering?
Subsequently, this v-10 makes me embarrassed for the team of designers who need to convince eachother and the bosses that this is all they could manage aesthetically with full knowledge of what they produced a scant few years ago. Also, f***ing shiny primer...get the hell out of here.
Look at seat post and seat mast angles.. copy paste baby!
An absolute bargain.
*rolls eyes*
P.S. Just rambling here
What has changed, obviously, is how much bike you now get for your money, which is astronomically better than before. Frame materials, manufacturing/craftsmanship, shifting, suspension, braking, etc. are all unfathomably better than 24 years ago. And not just at the top end, but even at the mid and low end of the spectrum too.
Now, this is not to say that modern bikes are not expensive. I’m definitely not the person who is spending $10k on a bike. But to say that today’s bikes are getting more expensive is simply not true- bikes have always been this way. It’s not a new phenomenon.
I think Santa Cruz make great bikes, I really do. But to charge this much for a product which is 50% external companies components is a joke. AND, to then not even include the new reserve wheels is, frankly, disgraceful. That’s harsh, but I just find it a joke.
@ka-brap:
Gotta be a cube. Old fashion design, geo and ride like s@st
Small production numbers vs mass produced but same price?
Shows how insane biking has become
Their Ever complete bike is a better value for money than the (now) old gen V10 completes.
Framesets are expensive yes, but their completes are rather competttively priced compared to Trek and Santa Cruz, especially given the production costs invovlved in europe.
Their trail bikes are more expensive here also, you´re right there.
We´re talking about the V10 here though, so that´s what i compare.
The Ever completes are better value for money at least in europe. Maybe Santas are cheaper in the US?
Also if we´re hitting 10000$/€ pricepoints anyways, personally i start looking at components first and price second and the Unnos have a lot of expensive and well thought out components on them, unlike Trek who have mostly Bontrager on their top of the line offerings which does look cheap, even though they may work well enough.
Anyways, it´s just an interesting thought experiment given the fact that Unno produce in europe with immense costs, yet some high end companies outsource production to cut costs, and they are still on a comparable price level.
So while i definitely like the 29er V10 (not so much the 27.5ers geometry) it leaves me with a bitter taste that they seem to charge a premium simply because of their name and the Unno comparison makes that painfully obvious (at least for us europeans).
Pon Holding must be happy.
I'm with drpete here, warranty makes a difference. Also they are an expensive aftermarket option despite being inhouse. You're most likely right though, they cut costs for Santa Cruz, but at least they have something to set them apart from the rest in the warranty.
It's all about perceived value anyway and mostly comes down to resale value for most people and those wheels will get your bike sold before any Bontrager equipped Trek.
In the end any 10000$ bike is a ridiculously stupid investment and only worth the money from a emotional standpoint no matter the components.
@Loki87: you're totally right about perveived value. One time I passed by a clothing store in a fancy area in London and got curious about something in the display; it was was an orange velvet tank top, plain. Price was £300. f*cking idols. I mean, if they can ask for that and someone will buy, go for it
And yes, you can have it both ways. They can be so damn cheap to produce that guaranteing them (and of course not every rim will need to) until the customer, for whatever reason, end up with something else still makes a desirable profit.
At least you’ve finally exposed why everyone at Santa Cruz is driving around in Bentleys: they’re giving away free wheels.
I would love to try one of these bigger wheeled ones, but the old 26" full carbon one is so good I just justify the cost to change yet.
Is it me or is the geo still a bit on the conservative side?
I’m glad the 27.5 and 29 are unique and not some half-ass flip chip and headset cup to run different wheel size.
But with the new rules about being able to run different wheel size what is going to happen?
I am also talking out my ass as I have flows on hope pro 4s and that's fine with me.
That’s Pon ownership. A million small cuts to increase the profit margin hoping you won’t notice.
If they cut corners where you can see it, wonder where else they did it.
I know some people who work for bike companies and they aren’t exactly rich. Your idea that the bike industry is this drug cartel that’s gouging its way to massive profits doesn’t square with reality.
They raised the price and lowered the spec.
Damn since when have 27.5" wheels transitioned to suit "smaller" riders?? I just stepped into the 27.5 world and I wouldn't consider myself a smaller rider. I guess I need to sell my new bike then already
Millennials; "DID YOU JUST ASSUME MY WHEEL PREFERANCE?! We demand wheel size neutrality!
Pinkbike is supposed to be our safe space, what is going on!!!?!?!?!?
Almost died on one, 10/10 would recommend.
Actually, on the M and L, I notice identical reach....
*sees shock surrounded by frame* “That’d be even more annoying to clean”
Thanks
911turbo-chalk
ferrari-grigio silverstone
and so on
Makes my new turquoise Yeti look downright timeless—which it is.