There wasn't nearly as much controversy surrounding the Enduro category in this year's Field Test, especially compared to the heated debates that popped up regarding the Downcountry contenders. While “enduro” is still a fairly nebulous term, the bikes featured here all have a strong focus on the descending side of the equation, but they can also be pedaled to the top without
too much effort.
Rear travel amounts range from 150mm to 170mm, and four out of five of the bikes have forks with 170mm of travel - the SB165 goes a little further, with a 180mm Fox 36 up front.
The Yeti SB165 and the Ibis Mojo HD5 both roll on 27.5” wheels, while the rest of the field have 29” wheels, although Rocky does make a 27.5” version of the Slayer.
What do the geometry numbers look like? When it comes to head angle, the SB165 was the slackest at 63.5-degrees, with the rest of the field hovering around the 64-degree mark. Interestingly, all of the 29ers had chainstays that measured 442mm, while the Yeti SB165 has 435mm chainstays and the Ibis Mojo HD5 has the shortest at 430mm.
Even though it's a fairly tight grouping when it comes to geometry figures and travel amounts, each bike had its own distinct personality on the trail. From the mild-mannered, well-rounded nature of the Ibis Mojo HD5 to the incredible stability at speed of the Specialized Enduro, every bike featured here brought something different to the table.
Once we'd racked up enough miles in the bike park and around Pemberton it was time to sit down and pick some favorites.
2020 Field Test - Testers' Choice
Mike Kazimer's Pick: Specialized EnduroThe Specialized Enduro was my pick of this bunch, hands down. It's a bike that feels limitless when it comes to speed and terrain – it'll go as fast as you want, no matter how steep and gnarly the trail. The improvements over the previous version are noticeable, and welcome; there's no question that it's a more formidable bike than ever before.
Granted, this wouldn't be my pick if I didn't have easy access to properly rowdy terrain, but I'm fortunate enough to live in a location where that's not an issue. It does pedal quite well, especially considering the amount of travel, it just doesn't have quite enough liveliness to make it a bike I'd choose for mellower trails. I also wouldn't mind seeing a steeper actual seat tube angle, but that's really my only minor gripe with the geometry, and it's one that goes away as soon as the trail points downwards.
Mike KazimerHeight: 5'11" / 180cm
Inseam: 33" / 84cm
Weight: 160 lbs / 72.6 kg
The price tag on the S-Works version we tested raised plenty of eyebrows, and there's no getting around the fact that $9,750 is a whole lot of money for a bike. However, the Enduro doesn't get my vote because of its carbon wheels, wireless electronic dropper post, or XTR drivetrain. Nope, it's the geometry and suspension performance that put it on my list. In fact, I spent time on the Elite model earlier this year, which is almost half the price, and my impressions of the bike's capabilities weren't diminished at all.
Along with being the only bike in this category with a secret compartment for storing a tube and some snacks, the Enduro's handling in and out of the bike park placed it right at the top of my list. This is one very impressive machine, and a bike I'd be just as happy pedaling to the top of a big ol' decent as I would taking lift-served lap after lift-served lap.
Jason Lucas' Pick: Specialized Enduro
It might seem like the easy answer, but I'm going to agree with Kaz on this one. I knew the Enduro had the numbers to be a fast bike when pointed downhill, but my legs quivered in fear when it came time to climb the bike around Pemberton. However, those fears were quickly put to rest once I started spinning up the climb trail and realized that things were going to be OK.
The fact that this bike can take on any trail in the Whistler Bike Park at near-downhill bike speeds and get you to the top of a climb relatively easily is impressive. The Enduro wouldn't be my first choice if I lived somewhere with mellower terrain, but here in the PNW, where many of the trails can be defined as "steep and deep," it fits the bill.
Jason LucasHeight: 6'1" / 185.4 cm
Weight: 205 lb / 90.7 kg
Inseam: 33.5" / 85 cm
I can see the comment section now: "Of course the most expensive bike is the best!" Yeah, this build is really, really nice, and you know what? To some people $10,000 isn't all that much money. However, I'm not one of those people.
Specialized offers the Enduro at more affordable price points with very capable builds. I don't need fancy carbon wheels or a battery powered dropper post, so if I was spending my own cash I'd go for one of the less expensive options. You still get the same geometry, frame features, and suspension platform that the S-Works has, but at a fraction of the price.
Nice Bminor chord progression...
Seeing you in the race course , it’s go time@Tmackstab:
If you cannot get them from the manufacturer at a similar pricepoint, upgrade the cheap bikes until the msrp is about the same. It simply doesn't make sense to test a bike that is 5000 dollars cheaper than the winner and then complain it is heavy and has poor brakes. There's almost 2 grand available to upgrade the GT to the price of the next cheapest competitor, the Ibis. That definitely gets you a set of decent brakes and some lighter replacements for wheels and cockpit parts.
When did Enduro bikes stop being thought of as bikes for enduro racing?
I upgraded a very affordable Cube Stereo 160 (I know, most hated bike on this site ...) and replaced the front 2pot XT with 4pot Zee (kept the XT lever), Fox Performance 34 with a NOS Manitou Mattoc Pro (with IRT) and Fox DPS Evol Performance with a Manitou McLeod and swapped the 180 front disc for a 203 one. Shopping for discounts, I spent around €600 without selling the old parts. If I didn't keep them as spares, I would probably get half of that amount back, easily.
The difference in performance is staggering though and makes me wonder why I should spend so much on top level builds when smart shopping and swapping can get you 95% of the performance for half of the price.
No way a cube 160 is comparable to these. Cubes are just long travel trial bkes
So I’d say it the other way around: hopefully in the future we will see Enduro Evo with even more travel.
Coil shock it wallowed everywhere, unless you over sprung it, then it just felt choppy. Air shock was a big improvement (db air) no idea why specialized specced a coil on the carbon one, super deluxe, float x would of been a far better choice.
Sold it and went back to my Enduro sworks, lighter and far quicker up the hills and down the hills.
The current Evo with an X2 rear shock (stock coil and DPX2 suck) is a weapon on the descents, but not the most efficient climbing machine. It does climb rough tech well though.
Optic does tick a lot of boxes, getting a proper meaningful demo in the UK is going to be a challenge, as the UK distributor doesn't have any demo bikes!
Lol ya troll. The Progression is strong with the Optic
Doesn't this kind of seem to contradict the fact that the SB165 was one test riders fastest bike and being middle of the pack (2% behind) the second test riders?
We're looking to level up our testing every year, but doing German magazine style bench-testing and then implying some sort of certainty about speed test results would be unhelpful at best and dishonest at worst.
@JohnnyVV We rode the bikes a TON outside of the park, and our impressions weren't just formed there. We chose the timed testing lap because of the helpful logistics with the chairlift, and it obviously has an EWS pedigree. More info on our timed testing here: www.pinkbike.com/news/video-how-we-tested-at-the-2020-pinkbike-field-test.html
We've spoken to Rocky Mountain several times since the failure and have not received a definitive answer yet either. We're hopeful that with further testing they can figure it out, because that bike was awesome till it wasn't.
@Grunk we definitely want to follow up once they get to the bottom of it.
Is that a 29er?
Ugh!!
But hey if you guys wanna crowdsource some TimBits or something we're down.
I wouldn't worry about that bike breaking. It would be different if there were many people reporting a particular model breaking often, or a particular manufacturing run of them breaking.
@monkeybizz:
Yet the travel and geo is almost a perfect match for the numbers on the Enduro, within a few mm on wheelbase for the respective reaches, and in fact those differences are longer on the Slayer for the closest matching sizes (going by reach). Sure seems you guys had a winner picked out before this shootout...
"More versatile than travel and geometry numbers suggest"
Again it's a great match for the Enduro. Why didn't the Enduro, or others, get this accolade?
Megatower - Ransom - Enduro - SB150 - Range
Course, if they would have used the stock tires they would have complained about the big tires... but trying the bike with 165 cranks or something might have been a good compromise between tires they don't like and making the BB too low?
Thanks! and Merry Christmas! Santa's just done building a new kids bike!!
No thanks.
My £4.5k YT Jeffsy was the same price and came with top spec everything.
Spec Enduro- purepred racer/park bike/mini downhill bike that can pedal back up
I doubt many people are cross shopping
much like in this video. www.youtube.com/watch?v=E3Qb97HHj1Q
Now it may not be true, but the inability to test ride pushed me one way. I drew up the frames in CAD based on available geo and picked standover, price. I do miss a water bottle holder, If I'm honest.