Romanian XC racer Vlad Dascalu has been found guilty of an anti-doping rule violation by the UCI Anti-Doping Tribunal for "committing three whereabouts failures in a 12-month period" and has been given a 17-month suspension. This means that he will not be allowed to compete at the Paris Olympics, the rest of the 2024 XC World Cup season, and the entire 2025 XC World Cup season.
The Trek Factory Racing rider is always a contender for the XC World Cup podium and finished 10th in the XCO at round one in Mairipora and 9th in the XCO at round two in Araxa.
Dascalu is one of
over 1000 pro cyclists who are part of the UCI Out-of-Competition Testing Program. An essential part of the anti-doping program is that Anti-Doping Organisations (ADO) must be able to "locate athletes at any time and to conduct tests on a no advance notice basis."
As a member of the Registered Testing Pool, Dascalu must supply the International Testing Agency with a three-month schedule of his whereabouts information before each quarterly period and be "available for Testing at the location and time specified in the 60-minute time slot identified in their Whereabouts Filing for the day in question."
A late or incomplete submission is a Whereabouts Failure, insufficient/inaccurate information is a Whereabouts Failure, and 3 Whereabouts Failures in 12 months is an Anti-Doping Rule Violation.
More information on the
whereabouts rules can be found here.
UCI statement concerning Vlad Dascalu:
The Union Cycliste Internationale (UCI) advises that the UCI Anti-Doping Tribunal has rendered a decision against Romanian rider Vlad Dascalu.
The Tribunal found Vlad Dascalu guilty of an anti-doping rule violation (whereabouts failures by a rider) due to him committing three whereabouts failures in a 12-month period. The Tribunal has imposed a 17-month period of suspension on the rider.
In accordance with the World Anti-Doping Code and the UCI Anti-Doping Rules, the period of suspension starts on the day of notification of the decision, in this case 21 May 2024, and will remain in force until 20 October 2025.
Furthermore, in line with the Procedural Rules of the Tribunal, the decision will be published on the UCI website. The decision may be appealed before the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) within one month.
The UCI will not comment further on the matter.
I don't think it is BS. These are the rules, they are quite simple and they know them perfectly. It is like being caught speeding while driving. Only the one who choose to not abide to the rules get caught speeding
He undersells it when he says it's "a bit of a hassle." I forget the podcast I heard it on, but journalist Abby Mickey, wife of Toms Skuijns, had some crazy stories about how they've had to bend way over backwards to accommodate out-of-competition anti-doping tests. Stuff like getting an anti-doping call while waiting to board a plane, forcing them to miss the flight to go back home to pee in a cup.
I'm not saying out-of-competition doping tests shouldn't happen or even suggesting that there's a better way to do them. Just saying that, the way it's currently set up, it seems well within the realm of plausible for Vlad to have incurred this infraction simply by doing everything right, living his life, and being a bit unlucky.
They obviously know that it's not possible to provide 3 months in advance with precise location so it needs to be fulfilled to the best of the athlete knowledge. In some cases those details are available quite in advanced, such as competition schedules, flights, team training camps, and also can be delegated to a third party, like a coach, team manager, etc.
The whereabouts can be updated in case of changes, and it's only necessary to be available at least 1hr per day in said location, although that doesn't mean the athlete will only be tested during that time.
It's not such an inflexible system. To miss it twice, you can be sure that you're now being targeted, missing it a third time it's either IQ failure or intentional negligence.
There is propably also some kind of limit where you can't change the place/time where you're reachable for one hour one minute before, but I don't know how that works.
Hope that helped
Source: "Plan Z" podcast by Ex-Pro-Cyclist Rick Zabel
>"wife of Toms Skuijns, had some crazy stories about how they've had to bend way over backwards to accommodate out-of-competition anti-doping tests. Stuff like getting an anti-doping call while waiting to board a plane, forcing them to miss the flight to go back home to pee in a cup."
-- in that case it means they didn't filled their whereabouts correctly.
Sure it is a hassle. But it is part of the job. It is not exactly on the same scale but I don't like having to think about clocking in and out online when I am working, I don't like filling my timesheets at the end of the week. Heck I don't even like having to tell HR whenever I want to take a day off. I am still doing it. 1000 riders are in this program and do the job because they have to do the job and they are allowed 2 mistakes in a 12 months period without penalties. You can't have a similar system without being harsh on those not taking it seriously. Otherwise it cannot serve its purpose.
> it seems well within the realm of plausible for Vlad to have incurred this infraction simply by doing everything right, living his life, and being a bit unlucky.@occasionalcross: So what ? Jonas Vingegaard had one infraction, which was not penalized = system is working. A single mistake just gives you a warning. It is one thing to use a joker because of a mistake, it is another to have done it twice already, be warned of the consequences and keep doing it.
>"wife of Toms Skuijns, had some crazy stories about how they've had to bend way over backwards to accommodate out-of-competition anti-doping tests. Stuff like getting an anti-doping call while waiting to board a plane, forcing them to miss the flight to go back home to pee in a cup."
-- in that case it means they didn't filled their whereabouts correctly.
Sure it is a hassle. But it is part of the job. It is not exactly on the same scale but I don't like having to think about clocking in and out online when I am working, I don't like filling my timesheets at the end of the week. Heck I don't even like having to tell HR whenever I want to take a day off. I am still doing it. 1000 riders are in this program and do the job because they have to do the job and they are allowed 2 mistakes in a 12 months period without penalties. You can't have a similar system without being harsh on those not taking it seriously. Otherwise it cannot serve its purpose.
> it seems well within the realm of plausible for Vlad to have incurred this infraction simply by doing everything right, living his life, and being a bit unlucky.
I am not buying it. After 2 infractions one would be extra extra cautious about it. As mentionned, they can do late submissions by sms or email if they have changes of plans. It is pretty much real time.
He needed the antibiotic, but had no way at the time to check or know if it was on the WADA list.
There is an interview about this here: www.pinkbike.com/news/interview-martin-maes-ews-failed-drug-test-im-not-guilty-i-just-made-a-stupid-mistake.html
Martin's error most probably would have been avoided by filing for a TUE before the Oceania EWS rounds. He tried to do so retrospectively but was not accepted.
The substance found in Martin is not a PED but a diuretic, which means it helps you increase urinary excretion thus helping dilute and getting rid of other substances faster or making them untraceable during doping controls.
Lizzy Banks explains it very well in her blog:
lizzybanks.co.uk
extract from her article:
"Diuretics are banned because they have the potential to act as a masking agent for performance enhancing drugs such as anabolic steroids. This masking effect could only occur when a large enough quantity of a diuretic has been consumed in order to greatly increase the amount of urine produced, therefore diluting the concentration of the banned substance in the urine"
All the gains in doping are done during the off season, that's how you can get to the next level. Using PED during competition would make a marginal difference, which if you're fighting head to head for the win, it will surely help but won't transform you into the Hulk.
That's why they have the out-of-competition testing program and they are so harsh when somebody misses a test or say they'll be in A and then they are in B.
First, this isn't a 24/7 tracking program. My understanding is you have to be available for testing 1 hour per day. Annoying but not insanely onerous. There's also over 1000 cyclists that are subject to this around the world and most seem to cope with it ok, even if the system isn't perfect. And this isn't just one missed test and you get a ban. It's three missed tests in a year--as in, testers actually showed up and he wasn't there--and he should have been informed of each one, so he'd know he's on thin ice. If the testers went to the wrong place or he wasn't informed or there's some other extenuating circumstance, the ban can be overturned, which has happened in the past for these kinds of reasons.
Yes it's harsh, but it's deliberately harsh to discourage others from abusing the system.
No idea where the 17 months comes from, maybe some kind of relation between the last good test and the half-life of tested substances.
I know people think it's harsh, but missed tests have to be taken seriously to maintain the credibility of the sport.
Maybe his "camp" did everything for him, and he simply didnt follow the rules, maybe hes doping, and screwed up his cycle, maybe.....loads of possibilities, that we know nothing about, but go on, condemn those around him, and not the man who is ultimately responsible
Professional athletes should have a team around them to help manage things like this. Almost all of them do, certainly more so in the sports where there’s more money involved.
I also said “if he’s clean” which could also be taken as a condemnation of him without knowing all the facts.
I re-read the article this morning (obviously misread the details the first time) and I would say I'm leaning more towards deliberate and nefarious. This wasn't a case of being somewhere other than where he said he would be. This is a case of keeping the authorities (and possibly his team) in the dark, having already received 2 warnings, and knowingly committing the same infraction again.
I'd also suggest reading about Lizzie Banks experiences following her anti-doping violation too. The people at WADA love their red tape, so athletes are very well served just keeping their paperwork in check.
We are of course all just speculating - but some time people do stupid stuff cause they are incompetent, sometime cause they try to cover up greater transgressions but sometime it's just a way out of whatever hamster-wheel they feel trapped in..
Hes a RedBull athlete, why on earth would you make the assumption he doesnt have that support available to him.
If he was a privateer, sure, maybe, hes a top 10 XC athlete, to think, or assume he doesnt have that support seems short sighted at best
@Will-narayan: That's a possibility, but also a massive stretch. I doubt it would excuse his actions either.
@sourmix: He's competed and won races during the 12 months in question, so he would have been tested as a matter of course. But what he was up to in between races now comes under scrutiny and subject to speculation. I wonder what details his appeal will reveal, if he appeals at all.
You can have your suspicions based on an era when testing wasn't as stringent, but you can't claim they are based upon any facts or actual evidence.
That's a great movie and I believe it. Russia also was banned from the past Olympics because of systematic doping.. something that I don't believe exists in bike racing anymore and which you have provided exactly zero evidence of.
Not a mvdp fan at all, just used him as an example because he's the most dominant racer in awhile. And you got nothing on him, not even a rumor or conspiracy?
I totally get that you are a skeptic but your own words completely imply that mvdp is doping without providing one shred of evidence that he is. His performances in the last year have have been absolutely extraordinary.
I'm certainly not going to gush over unbelievable performances just because someone hasn't tested positive.
In the meantime, I look forward to the Olympic 5,000m and 10,000m running races. They will deliver super human performances, it's going to be great.
Because you have no proof or facts to support your argument.
But you pretend to know it all.
That seems like the definition of a conspiracy theorist coward, would you not agree?
I'm having a debate about doping with someone who's stated "it's simply to difficult to get away with it now with the testing". You've taken the blue pill and I've taken the red pill.
You've taken the easy cynical nihilistic route of thinking, conspiracies offer uneducated people an easy way to understand complicated issues.
And you are a complete coward for implying mvdp dopes but not having the guts to actually say it. You disrespect clean athletes and attempt to compromise their achievements, coward.
And Nate Diaz is a concussed dumbass who knows nothing about sports outside of his idiot world of MMA fighting.
And you are a complete coward for implying mvdp dopes but not having the guts to actually say it. You disrespect clean athletes and attempt to compromise their achievements, coward
Testing is good. I wish there was more money to do it in more masters and amateur races in the US. Based on the all the ads I see for "anti-aging" clinics in the US, I would not be surprised to see a lot of old guys busted for Testosterone if there was more testing.
- challenging 2 day amateur race with ages ranging from 16 to 60+
- typical cut off time is between 5 to 7 minutes
- even before the finish line, if you are outside a certain corridor (roads are being opened up behind the support vehicles) you are out of the race
- typically only 33% to 50% finish the race in time
- this year the race was finished in the shortest time ever with a cut off time of only 2:30 min
- only 52 riders were able to finish in time which is in line with previous iterations of the race when there were no drug tests
elperiodicodevillena.com/comunicado-de-la-organizacion-del-torneo-interclubs-vinalopo-de-ciclismo
While there is no proof that noone left the race due to the possibility of a drug test, there is a difference between not being fast enough to finish in time and deliberately quitting.
In the event that the position that it is in is not the position that it wasn't, the system has acquired a variation, the variation being the difference between where the missile is, and where it wasn't. If variation is considered to be a significant factor, it too may be corrected by the GEA. However, the missile must also know where it was.
The missile guidance computer scenario works as follows. Because a variation has modified some of the information the missile has obtained, it is not sure just where it is. However, it is sure where it isn't, within reason, and it knows where it was. It now subtracts where it should be from where it wasn't, or vice-versa, and by differentiating this from the algebraic sum of where it shouldn't be, and where it was, it is able to obtain the deviation and its variation, which is called error.
“You haven’t heard anything yet. Wait until I really get going”
I love a good job of b**l s**t. You nailed it.
Flückiger's case was different as it was "provisionally" suspended before beging judged and he then made his case and got the suspension lifted after expertise . In Dascalu's case it is not a provisionnal suspension but a definitive one, he probably had a chance to defend his case.
Dascalu raced European Champs just over a week ago, so the suspension runs from (close) to then.
You could share your location one day, and then be in another location the next, how would the UCI rep find you? How would they book flights, hotels, etc?
tens of thousands of athletes figure it out.
Theres a possibility that most are uninformed on the daily life, and sacrifices of Olympic/high performace level athletes.
They eat/sleep/breathe training for this for most of their life, if they cant commit to it, well that life isnt for them. they have a choice to decide if that life is what they want t be the very best in the world.
I've always knew riders chose 1 hour time slot every day, and most of them chose the 6/7 am time slot. you don't have to be available always
If collecting blood you will have to be in a seated poition with feet fully on the ground and knees in a 90 degree angle for 10 minutes. This is to "normalize" or rather standardize for plasma volume shifts. Few athletes are aware of this. Testers will ask if you have been to altitude recently, sick or just got home from training. A 2 hour window after training is usually nescessary. So if you're a smart athlete you set your time slot to early in the morning before training. Always setting the same time of day (early morning) will make it less complicated for yourself.
An athlete can be in prioritized testing pool from their international federation and national antidoping agency (e.g. UCI and USADA). Not all national antidoping agencies work with e.g. UCI. So in some cases athletes can experience testers coming at the same day or close to each other from two organizations. In other cases they collaborate in an effort to have more strategic testing. Some athletes are tested a lot others less. It depends onmany factors, including the budget of your national anti-doping agency and their priorities.
I know all this because my fiancee was a professional MTB'er in bothe the UCI and Danish testing pool for 10 years. And I've published scientific litterature on the Athlete Biological Passport. It's not a bullit proof system but it has changed (not limited to but especially) cycling big time. Riders of our time can have a carreer without having to think of doping because of this. But it's rarely recognized and as many posts in this thread shows, many still sees the system as the culprit
If it was a one time event, sure, it could be excused...but he was a repeat offender.
"there's no actual proof he took anything"
Also:
Lance never had a positive doping control
E.g., be present & clean for a random test. That starts the clock. Start doping and being the unavailable for the random tests. After two "misses", stop doping in time to be clean before the third violation. Be present & clean for the third attempt at a random test. Reset the clock to 0.
Edit: My last job required drug testing. You get a call and instead of work, you go to the testing facility. On vacation or off? No problem.
Not quite the same as getting tested for recreational drugs in other professions.
My point is that most testing requirements do not include the demand you keep your employer or other informed of your whereabouts at all times.
Something else. WADA did nothing when swimmers from China tested positive before the Olympics and used the "my sample was contaminated" excuse. One or two, sure. But it was more than 20 swimmers.There have been other scandals as well. How does that further sport?
Thank you
There's a young woman road cyclist from the UK who was flagged for doping last year. She spent her and her husbands life savings during the suspension, and they just announced she was 100% clean, zero violations, have a nice life. She immediately retired and said she can't go through anything like that again and she'd rather just quit.
They ruin lives as much as catch the bad guys in my opinion.
There are plenty of insensitive things used on the internet, this isn't one of them, get over it.
I don‘t think there is any need for you to call me „entitled“ because of that. Please try to be nice
Understandable?
- flat tyre plus detour on my way to work
- random heavy traffic day
- kid was sick
- kids dance competition ran late
- tradesman cancelled work due to weather
That's five times I would have broke this policy since Monday.
This is a lazy process that is designed to be as easy as possible for the UCI and they other riders didn't follow the process. THEY JUST DIDN'T GET CAUGHT!!!