Throwback Thursday: 9 Bikes Turning 10 in 2022

Feb 10, 2022 at 8:48
by Ed Spratt  
As we make our way through 2022 and await all of the exciting new product developments let's take a look back through the archives at some of the bikes turning 10 this year.

1. Santa Cruz Tallboy LT & LTc

Santa Cruz Carbon All-Mountain Tallboy LTc 29er

Launched at the beginning of 2012 in Sedona, Arizona Santa Cruz announced a new version of its Tallboy 29er in the form of the LT and LTc. The longer travel Tallboy pushed the 29" bike into the trail category offering 135mm of rear travel using Santa Cruz's VPP suspension.

Santa Cruz offers the longer travel Tallboy as an alloy frame LT or the lighter weight carbon LTc. The carbon frame had a claimed weight of 5.3 pounds with the alloy version adding another pound of weight.

Geometrey

The early 29" trail bike from Santa Cruz offered a now pretty steep 69.5-degree head tube angle across its M, L and XL sizing with a 72.6-degree seat tube angle. These geometry numbers mark a 1.5-degree slackening of the head tube angle compared to the then-standard Tallboy.

After a first ride on the Tallboy LTc RC wrote: "The takeaway for Santa Cruz's new all-mountain/trail 29er is good news. Few 29ers feel this good at the outset. Fewer still handle as lightly and nimble in demanding situations - nimble enough that I often forgot that I was on a big-wheel bike. The Tallboy LTc is not going to inspire many to don a full face and mach DH runs and it isn't going to win XC races. The Tallboy LTc's selling point is in the riding. Hit the trail and in less than a mile, the boundaries between bike and rider begin to blur until at some point, there is only speed, effort and line choice. It doesn't get much better than that."

Fox 34 Float 29 RLC Kashima fork and Float RP23 Kashima shock.

Read more here.



2-4. Carbon Versions of the Specialized Demo 8, Santa Cruz V10 and Devinci Wilson

2013 Specialized Carbon Demo
2013 Santa Cruz V10c - Drive side shot
Devinic Wilson Carbon

2012 seemed to be the year for launching carbon DH bikes. For Specialized it launched the carbon Demo 8 with a redesigned carbon front end that reduce the frame weight by 408 grams compared to the full alloy bike. The Carbon 8 also used a more progressive suspension setup and the team replica bike featured a magnesium link.

While Santa Cruz had already launched a carbon V10 by 2012 it still had an alloy rear end, but the new model would be fully carbon fibre. Santa Cruz claimed the new bike would save 400 grams at the rear over alloy and the revised front triangle saved 300 grams on even the previous carbon version. The full-carbon V10 had been raced by the Syndicate during the 2012 season.

Finally, the Devinci Wilson also got a carbon update in 2012 bringing the overall bike weight down to a claimed 36.11lbs for the SL version.

Read more about the Specialized here.
Read more about the Santa Cruz here.
Read more about the Devinci here.



5. Scott Gambler with a 'Floating Linkage'
The new Scott Gambler.

Updated for 2012 was the Scott Gambler DH bike, seeing a new 'floating linkage' design that uses a higher pivot on the swingarm for a claimed improvement in handling severe impacts like rock gardens and square-edge bumps.

The bike also featured plenty of customization with a 15mm of adjustment at the rear dropouts, one degree for the head angle and ten millimeters of bottom bracket height from a two-position chip at the lower shock mount. Syncros also offered an angle adjust headset to change the head angle by two degrees, allowing you to make it as low as 60 degrees.

After taking the Gambler for a first ride Matt Wragg said: "Scott developed the new Gambler to be a World Cup contender that is versatile enough to be enjoyed by any good downhiller. The fact that we could simply get on it and ride hard indicates that Scott's team has achieved that goal. After only two days on the bike, though, we are left with more questions: Will the Gambler hold up to daily abuse? What is it like on different terrain? After my short time with the Gambler, I am confident enough to say that Ben Walker and the Scott team have created a top-level downhill bike."

Scott USA Gambler geometry

Details of the shock and linkage.

Read more here.



6. Lapierre Spicy 916 with electronic shock

Lapierre 2013 Spicy side shot

While Rockshox launched its new Flight Attendant electronic suspension last year, back in 2012 there were a number of bikes in the Lapierre range running electronic shocks. The e.i Electronic Suspension works using a pod attached to the damper containing a servo motor that alters the shock damping from locked out to wide open in .01 seconds. Sensors on the crank, hidden in the BB shell determine if the rider is pedaling, while accelerometers located on the stem cap and the fork slider register the severity of each impact before the rear wheel hits a bump.

After the press camp for the new bikes and shock RC said: "As for the Spicy’s e.i. rear suspension option; I’d say that you’d be an idiot not to run it. Let e.i’s simple electronics and trail-proven RockShox Monarch shock manage the details and use every bit of your concentration to ride the terrain ahead."

RockShox Monarch RT3 with d.i servo

Lapierre 2013 Spicy frame details Fox 34 fork e.i.Monarch shock and Formula The 1 brake

Read more here.



7. Redalp

Less than 37 lb 16.8gk Incredibly fast

Offering a very unique silhouette compared to most DH bikes the Redalp used an articulated chain link for a more rearward axle path and claimed "outstanding suspension performance". As part of the frame design the Redalp also had a straight link from the head tube to the wheel with claims of increased stiffness, lower weight and solving all of the problems associated with high pivots...

 Pro-Motion set up. No chain growth no squat no pedal back kick. Simple but highly efficient

Read more here.



8. Banshee Prime

Banshee Prime

Launched in October of 2012 the Banshee Prime was the brand's first 29" bike and came with 130mm or rear travel. Banshee's aim with the Prime was to use geometry normally found on a 26" bike alongside its new KS Link suspension platform.

bigquotesThe Banshee Prime is a 29er for guys who don't think they like 29ers. The relatively slack head angle, low BB height and extremely stiff frame makes the Prime ride like no other 29er out there. We took everything we learned from our Paradox 29er hardtail and from our 26" full suspension bikes and combined that knowledge and experience to create an aggressive all mountain 29er that's extremely capable and a huge amount of fun to ride. The stand-out feature on the Prime is the speed that it can carry across all types of terrain. It's noticeably quicker on the climbs and the combination of the big wheels, slack geometry and KS Link suspension allow you to take lines on the descents that a 130mm travel bike has no business riding. If ever there was a bike to silence the 29er doubters, the Prime is it. Banshee Bikes

In terms of geometry, the Prime used an adjustable head angle between 67.5 and 68.5 degrees with an effective seat tube angle of between 75 and 76.6 degrees depending on the geometry setting.

Banshee Prime
Banshee Prime

Read more here.



9. Cotic Rocket

Cotic Rocket Full Bike

Using Reynolds 853 Ovalform steel tubing and running 150mm of travel the first Cotic Rocket was launched in the middle of 2012 with 26" wheels and one of Cotic's classic edits. Featuring a 66.5-degree headangle the Rocket also used Cotic's own Droplink suspension platform.

Views: 37,373    Faves: 782    Comments: 72


Read more here.




Author Info:
edspratt avatar

Member since Mar 16, 2017
3,093 articles

143 Comments
  • 108 11
 That demo was always such a good looking bike
  • 17 44
flag fewnofrwgijn (Feb 10, 2022 at 12:19) (Below Threshold)
 Nah 2009 demo was where it’s at, 2012 demo looks weird like the 2010 enduros did
  • 11 3
 @fewnofrwgijn: 2009 demo was sexy as a bike gets
  • 19 0
 The Stevie Smith Wilson was always my favorite and still is. imgur.com/a/ULgiC1t
  • 3 2
 the devinci suspension though
  • 9 4
 All the demo's are pretty good looking in my opinion with the exception ginger headed step child that is the model that had the asymetric frame design....
  • 6 1
 Sam Hill said that bike offered a terrible ride in some podcast but it did look good
  • 1 1
 Always yes
  • 3 1
 @mirskeinereingefalln: Which wasn't surprising, he was coming off a Sunday which was easily the best riding DH bike of the time. I remember that Demo riding reeeaaaally heavy, not just being literally extremely heavy but behaving like it as well. I'm not surprised he wasn't too pleased with it, but it was probably his big break payday-wise.
  • 1 0
 Im With Ya Dude.
  • 2 0
 @JulioValeinte: I could be wrong but I think Sam Hill was saying the Carbon version was bad, but the aluminum one was better.
  • 64 0
 Banshee has been very quietly ahead of the geometry curve for a very long time. You can not go wrong with their bikes
  • 8 0
 I wish the rear travel on the Titan was a little more but other then that I love mine!
  • 12 1
 Not bleeding edge IMO, but not behind the times either.

But I will say, the Banshee looks "less dated" than the majority of the list up there. But, you can see even just in photos how much reach has grown... That prime looks tiny, like a size small or something Razz .
  • 3 0
 just look around for a decent model of theirs - they are solid no smoke and mirrors
  • 6 0
 Is this why used ones don't pop up for sale often? y'all keep them for a decade?
  • 8 0
 I was going to post ..."The Banshee is about the only one that is 'ridable' by today's standards"
  • 2 0
 @Gwizard: yep if it were 170 front and rear i would be stoked, but I still love mine dearly.
  • 3 4
 @Doogster: no, it's because they cracked.
x2 V2.5 Spitfires
x1 V3 Rune.
  • 2 0
 Yep, Banshee bikes ride great.
  • 1 0
 @Doogster: naw, but I got mine 3 years old and then kept it for 6
  • 2 3
 Can't go wrong with bikes whose most reliable feature is their tendency to crack.
  • 3 0
 @waffleShirt: riding a banshee since the scream, never cracked one.
  • 2 0
 I still have my Rune and the only thing that holds it back is the operator. Just got orange powder coat last year and a second generation Marzocchi 66 38mm so I think I am future-proofed.
  • 1 0
 @chickenlassi: well you will be easy to spot
  • 51 2
 Redalp is still ugly, come back in another 10 years.
  • 13 0
 I'd wish a worldwide public appeal and a complete report/interview/(test) to know who actually bought and ride this bike on this planet..... and WHY?!!
  • 8 0
 Did it actually get produced?
Did anyone see one being ridden?
  • 11 1
 There is no bike I've ever seen that I'd rather take for a ride. Honestly.
  • 3 0
 @nozes: I saw one outside a bar in Les Gets
  • 9 1
 I was under the impression that we had killed it with fire
  • 1 0
 Isn't the linkage actually accentuating pedal bob ?
If you push the cranks, it pulls the pulley down, wich pivots the "triangle" backwards, which pushes the swingarm upward and compresses the suspension right ?
Or is it a leverage thing and the triangle link is here to prevent this kind of behaviour ?
  • 2 0
 @danstonQ: I did try to test it at the time, but if I remember correctly they would only do it if I went to them in the middle of an already busy summer.
  • 1 0
 @deli-hustler: i wondered if anyone ever bought one. Thanks for confirming it.
  • 1 0
 @Intensevp: I kind of hoped that it was a demo bike that Redalp were trying to unload on a shop in the village Smile
  • 23 3
 Remember when 29ers were becoming a thing and engiNERDS made the head angles STEEPER because that was that the theoretical analysis told them? Too lazy to build a prototype and actually ride it. All these bikes are JUNK because of horrific geo. Black mark on bike engineering. Smile
  • 17 0
 Look at the glowing review for that Tallboy though. The engineers were just trying to build a bike that felt *precisely* as crappy as the existing bikes, and they succeeded. They gave people exactly what they asked for, they were just asking for the wrong thing.
  • 4 0
 @Genewich: Had a 2012 TBLT and can confirm.

Had to size up with a large frame with it's crappy 19.5" STL since the TTL & reach was so short and I didn't want to run a 100mm stem. Combining that with the old school geo, wallowing RP23 shock and early VPP, making the bike feel like an expensive pogo stick. Blarf

Bought a Process 111 two years later and that completely changed my attitude about 29ers. And then Kona f*cked up the end game LoL.
  • 4 0
 I had a 2014 Fuel Ex 29er Trek had their "G2 Geometry" or something. 69.5 degree head angle and big 51mm offset forks designed to make it "as nimble as a 26er". Lost count of how many times I went OTB on that thing.
  • 3 0
 Those first few generations of 29ers were BRUTAL to ride. Endo-citty, toe-verlap, and general sketchiness. The first 29er I can remember being reasonable is probably the Specialized Enduro? Maybe Trek's remedy.

Got I don't miss 2x drivetrains. That tallboy was honestly a decent bike, but it makes me nauseous thinking about the miserable shifting and the constant OTB fear.
  • 1 0
 Whether some may like it or not, Specialized is one of the biggest contributors to the fact that we have fun 29ers in 2022 not in 2025. Banshee Prime was a thing too for sure. But The first Spec Stumpy Evo 29 made a real dent. Then the Enduro 29 pissing in the faces of all great engineers who said that long travel 29ers won’t work because too many things occupy same space: tire, front mech, seat tube, chainring. Fricking chief engineer at Giant Mtb said it and it was already when XX1 was out.
  • 11 0
 Question for all those o-chain, chainless evangelists:

That Scott DH bike has a pivot probably as high as the new Trek Session. It had loads of chaingrowth and pedal kickback, but that Scott rode amazing. It was so fast. how?
  • 14 0
 Well it didn’t have four thousand points of engagement either
  • 5 6
 The derailleur has a spring to compensate for chain growth… as long as you aren’t pedaling it isn’t an issue
  • 4 1
 Everyone I knew with one complained about how hard it was to keep your feet on the pedals, especially in slow impacts.
  • 4 0
 @mustbike: I felt that too, actually, in the ultra slow, steep, tech it would kick you around if you locked up the rear wheel. But my solution there was just clipless, plus everywhere else it rode really well for its time.
  • 6 0
 Truthfully, that generation Gambler was absurdly fun to ride, but it wasn't a very good race bike at all, even for the time. Braking traction wasn't up to par with the class leaders (V10, Session, and Devinci Wilson come to mind), pedal kickback was an issue, and it was hard to maintain front wheel traction, especially in the short chainstay setting. The redeeming characteristic, and the reason most of us liked riding it so much, was that it was really slack, which made up for the shortcomings to a certain extent.
  • 4 3
 @hamncheez: If anything I could imagine it was Devinci that was the king of pedal kickback, at least it should have more than Scott. Find a pic of it's linkage. It easily gets up to 4cm of chain growth. I know because A two different owners told me that it is the only bike they felt kicks, B Antidote were deeply inspired by it when designing the first Dark Matter and added idler to make it smoother.
  • 6 0
 Did it though? Or is that just how you remember it? Because unless you're comparing it directly you're just membering. Lots of people remember specific cars from the 80s or 90s being fast, and now they get destroyed by a standard turbo diesel. Bikes are the same, we love to member.
  • 5 6
 @redrook: agreed. We talked with my friend not so long ago about the good old days when we felt fast because we found the limit of Hans Dampf tires in soft compound... as to cars it's over. Nothing beats a view of 3 dudes in super cars rolling around the center one behind another. 2 Lambos, Porsche GT3, revving with side windows pulled down. And then behind them drives this half bald somewhat fat dude in Tesla 3 dual motor with most bored expression on his face... he had the fastest car....
  • 15 0
 Pedal kickback isn't a thing above 4 mph.
  • 5 4
 @TEAM-ROBOT: You are ruining it for kinematicians.
  • 3 0
 @redrook: "for its time"

I was certainly faster on it than my buddies Demo with the short chainstays
  • 3 3
 @TEAM-ROBOT: Respectfully, a lot of people who are much faster than you (and me) strongly disagree with that statement.
  • 4 0
 @DirtCrab: what about Steve from Vorsprung?
youtu.be/grNUgu0H9YA
Don't know how fast he is though...
  • 8 0
 @DirtCrab: There's "pedal kickback" and then there's pedal kickback. I think a lot of fast and smart people (Neko Mulally comes to mind) use the term "pedal kickback" as a de facto descriptor for chain growth as a rear suspension design cycles through its travel. Chain growth is what's actually being shown on a kinematic chart when you read the graph for "pedal kickback." But that doesn't necessarily mean Neko is literally referring to pedal kickback. Pedal kickback literally refers to your pedals getting pulled back by the snap engagement of the rear hub, which is impossible above about 4 mph in most gears. If you're going above walking pace, your freehub simply can't engage fast enough to catch up with your spinning rear wheel. "Pedal kickback" aka chain growth has a lot of effects on suspension (it's related to anti-squat and increased harshness through bumps), but that doesn't mean you're feeling pedal kickback. This is why a bike with more "pedal kickback" on a kinematics chart will typically feel harsher through bumps than a similar bike with less "pedal kickback," even though the rider isn't literally feeling pedal kickback.
  • 1 0
 @TEAM-ROBOT: So far so good with your description of chain growth, but the picture changes when you get on the brakes hard enough to skid, and it's particularly noticeable on steep trails. Regardless of your actual greater-than-4-mph pace, once your rear wheel stops rotating (ie. skidding, if only momentarily), you start experiencing "literal" pedal kickback. Hence the growing list of actual fast guys (like Neko, and Loris, and Troy, etc.) running ochains citing improved braking characteristics.

Interestingly, Steve demonstrates this effect around 3:45 in the video above.

Please excuse the comically delayed response on a worthwhile discussion. Was gone riding this weekend.
  • 1 0
 @DirtCrab: with all the respect and sympathy to your good intentions, what you describe about braking makes no sense. If anything braking input straightens the suspension thus reduces chain growth. If there is any case where pedal kickback may be a thing is when suspension compresses and chain grows. Throwing someone off pedal like someone explains above is a kind of engineer himself story. You’d need at least quarter of a revolution of sudden crank back rotation to throw you off a pedal and for that you’d need a good 4” of chain growth during literally collapsing suspension, like spring medium failure.

I can’t believe we are still talking about these sea monsters in 2022. I though discussion died with suspension acronym BS in 2010 when Joe Graney of SC wanted convince everyone that their suspension is dominating. Just before they made second edition of Blirs and Nomad which had worse kinematics than the first one. Trek introduced their Active Braking Pivot, Giant revised Maestro. It was a shit show.

As to pro riders using anything. Unless you deliver it right from the horses mouth the idea that they make conscious decisions is not always the case. If anything you’d be better off talking to their mechanics not all of whom will be scientists. As if this level of scrutiny mattered anyways
  • 2 0
 @DirtCrab: Yeah, interesting point. I've ridden a lot of bikes really fast and I can't say I've ever felt anything like that, and I'm currently riding a bike with a lot of "pedal kickback" and flat pedals and haven't felt anything like that. I wonder if it would be noticeable in back-to-back testing with an o-chain. Worth pointing out the o-chain could be providing better braking feel for other reasons, though.

But it still might be a thing. "Pedal kickback" is a near-universal trait on full-suspension bikes, in varying degrees, so maybe I learned to accommodate my braking habits around it decades ago. So I guess I'm curious, but still not sure it's a problem to be solved. But maybe.
  • 1 0
 @calmWAKI @TEAM-ROBOT

On a highish pivot DH bike like the older Scott Gambler, and on the Gambler itself, I have felt pedal kickback. When you are going down Fire Swamp in Deer Valley (Park City) there are sections that are so steep you question whether a two-wheeled vehicle can even ride it, and its filled with 1 foot to 3 foot drops pretty much the whole way down, like irregular stairs. As you are holding on for dear life, the back wheel locks up and you feel your rear grip die, repeated "pops" of your forward foot pedal, and a fear of complete death. I never had my feet come off, even on flats, but it wasn't the greatest feeling. I don't know if it actually makes you slower though, and pros charge through this section at speed while I'm crawling down, butt behind my saddle. For me its an annoyance, but probably not slowing me down. Maybe its different for pros?
  • 1 0
 @hamncheez: I find it highly unlikely it was the pedal kick back kicking you on steeps. If you talked about brake jack it would be another story and that scott is a linkage driven single pivot. Also when you are too far behind the saddle every compression will kick you more especially when dropping into a g out with weight too far back, although if it were really steep and you were really too far back, the tire would rub your culo.

Having said that this is all theorizing so we may simply not bother going too deep into it.
  • 1 0
 @TEAM-ROBOT: I remember you laughing at me for saying that one should maybe adjust their braking patterns when some dude said X bike is unriedeable on steeps because of brake jack. Big Grin And now you mention it yourself. Now tell me... why do I remember this... I don't want to. I wish I didn't. I held your opinuions so close to my heart...
  • 3 0
 @calmWAKI: This will not be the last time I disappoint you.
  • 12 1
 Note to the journalists - it's impossible to be "very unique". Nor is it possible to be slightly unique. Uniqueness is binary, and non-subjective. It's a bit like me claiming that as i type this i'm "fairly alive".

However it's ok to say that i'm "a bit of a dick" and "pretty dull", when you consider the "fairly pedantic" shit i just wrote.
  • 14 0
 The Prime looks 5 at most.
  • 1 0
 ...true!
  • 7 0
 Two years later only Santa Cruz launched its Nomad v3 enduro (well, "all mountain" back then) bike. 65 HA, 74 SA, no front deraileur, short CS, low BB, 27,5 wheels. Now THAT was a revolution. That bike still rides great, I have one.
  • 5 0
 V3 Nomad is still my "daily rider" so comfortable and LIGHT compared to alot of more modern equivalents.
  • 4 0
 Same here, can't see me changing it anytime soon. I’m also still a huge fan of the miami vice colour.
  • 9 1
 Still rocking my pre production prime after 9 seasons.
  • 3 0
 Modern-day Banshees don't die, ever.
  • 1 0
 @mammal:
No bikes are indestructible, Banshee included. Yes, I think the V3 Banshees are fantastic, but I am on my second frame after cracking the first. But I have cracked frames from other manufacturers in the past too. Banshee customer service was fantastic and I wouldn’t hesitate to buy another.
  • 1 0
 @Dyceman: Congrats, I've known about 7 close friends who rode V2's and not one of them broke (2 of them ridden for 6 or more years). I'm sure you're an exception to the norm. And yeah, of course everything CAN break, Banshees usually don't.
  • 7 1
 honestly the carbon specialized demo was just bang. it overtake all to my opinion. not to mention Sam was blasting with it
  • 11 0
 Sam said in a recent vital podcast that the carbon demo was the worst sponsor bike he rode during his career. Couldn't really put his finger on why, but that's what he said.
  • 6 0
 @mammal: Gwin struggled on it too
  • 3 0
 @mammal: CS lengths?
  • 1 0
 @ViolaVesperlin: I couldn't say, I've never ridden one or even looked at a geo chart for that bike. I don't think Sam is a very analytical individual, but he's really honest, and has ridden a lot of different bikes, very well. So I'd believe him.
  • 1 0
 @mammal: hi, will be interested to read that interview if you have a link
  • 2 0
 @farmergilles: It's the Vital Inside Line Podcast with Sam Hill. You'll have to search it. They're really good podcasts when there's people on there who are of interest to you.
  • 1 0
 @mammal: thanks will find time to listen that podcast
  • 7 1
 Demo'd one of them "spicy" bikes. I was shocked (ehem) at how well they worked. That pun was originally unintentional.
  • 3 0
 I was a Lapierre dealer back in those days. The e:i allways received plenty of scepticism from the customers, I ran it on my own Zesty and can confirm your feedback. It was a hoot!
  • 7 1
 The Santa Crus Tallboy LTC was a rad bike for its time.
  • 5 0
 My takeaway from the tallboy is that my m980 cranks are 10 years old. Still going strong.
  • 1 2
 Get a magnifying glass and check around the pedal threads....just saying.
  • 5 1
 So in ~8.5 years, do we get to look back at the Grim Doughnut v1, and all act shocked when it looks like a run of the mill trail bike in 2030?
  • 3 0
 Look at all those front derailleurs! I thought those had been gone for longer than 10 years. This is a very cool piece to see what was going on not all that long ago. I wonder how many of those Red Alp frames actually sold.
  • 2 0
 Thank God it's not 2012. I was riding a Kona Stinky with 65HA and YT Tues with 63.5HA but God knows I had other bikes that needed an angleset so bad. Such as the desperate first and second attempts at trail 29ers. I am genuinely suprised PB felt no disgrace over bringing back their Tallboy review today.
  • 6 3
 My hardtail (Evil Sovereign) is turning 10 this year, still my one and only MTB.

Rear suspension design yet has to become obsolete...
  • 1 0
 My GT Corrado MTB turned Ten in 2004, my Trek Fuel EX9 turned ten in 2017.........State of the Art, not hardly!! But somehow they still seems to be enjoyable to ride. Even the fact that they have 26" wheels (GASP!!) doesn't seem to be enough to deter me!! lol
  • 3 0
 Crazy to think that if Redalp had just waited a decade they could have sold millions of high pivot rockets. *sarcasm of course*
  • 7 1
 DEVINCI FUCKING WILSON
  • 1 0
 Its a miracle Gambler ever got on WC podium, I've been riding 27.5" version for years, its a tank that can eat pretty much everything, but it feels like a slug as soon as the track mellows down just a bit... Beast on the steeps though!
  • 3 0
 Still got my Mk1 Rocket, still riding it a couple times a week. Excellent design that one, very reliable.
  • 2 0
 Red Alp looks like the bike that Simon Cowell should have gotten. Then, he wouldn't have broken his back. But then again, he would've broken his back regardless. Big Grin
  • 2 0
 Funny thing is, some of these are on the classifieds with price tags higher than their modern counterparts. Save em if you’ve got em!
  • 1 0
 Can’t believe some of these are “retro”

I had the 2013 sworks demo, defo one of the best DH bikes I’ve ever owned until the cables started wearing through the carbon at the shock recess
  • 1 0
 I bought that demo and still have it, love that bike only 250 of them in world and I was lucky to get 1 of the 5 that made it to Canada
  • 2 0
 I guess the lack of bottle-cage mounts explains why everyone was so thirsty back then...
  • 3 0
 That tallboy stable af with those 456mm chainstays
  • 1 0
 I wish my XL Tallboy had 455 chainstay! But it’s only got 445
Travel is 136 on mine so similar there
But the rest of the Geo is crazy different now
  • 2 0
 My god, sooner or later, any one year-old bike will be a Throwback Thursday bike!
  • 3 0
 That Cotic is still legit. I’d set one up as a jibbing bike….sweet!
  • 1 0
 You should have jusy called this 9 bikes that will make you feel old as f##k.
  • 2 0
 The prime is, arguably, still relevant. Good on them.
  • 3 1
 Boy 2012 was a steep year for head angles
  • 3 1
 Should have shown Orange, now vs then.
  • 2 0
 People must have been seriously flippin' thirsty in 2012.
  • 1 0
 still rocking the tall boy with a longer front shock and 1.5 degree head set.
  • 1 0
 Did they call it the gambler because it was a gamble to use that many pivots?
  • 1 0
 It's not in the list, but 1 week ago I sold my 2008 RM Slayer SXC I had for 12 years. A page is turned. Snif Frown
  • 1 0
 I think the Lapierre looks as good as any bike out there today. Nice slack head angle..
  • 1 0
 I remember when the "purists" used to treat 29er riders the same way they treat eMTB riders today.
  • 1 0
 No Commencal meta v3!?

Such a cool looking bike. I just got a frame to build up, looking forward to riding it.
  • 1 0
 Still remember Joe Bow showing me the first rough cut of Rocketman. Still makes me laugh.
  • 1 0
 Those Demo 8s will forever be the sickest rig
  • 4 4
 The demo is so sick. Santa Cruz was wayyyy ahead of the game in terms of geo. The Redalf is just awesome in every way.
  • 7 0
 SC saw in their crystal ball that 70° head angles and 18" chain stays would be the future.
  • 2 0
 @ViolaVesperlin: that long CS length is actually cutting edge currently. everything else, not so much.
  • 3 0
 @xy9ine: Saw 5" off the seat tube to hit modern numbers bingo
  • 1 0
 Still rocking the middle Santa Cruz up there!
  • 1 0
 Holy bottom bracket height batman!
  • 1 0
 can't even find anything on youtube about that redalp
  • 1 0
 This just made me feel a bit old...
  • 1 0
 Low key looks like a session from the future
  • 1 0
 I didn't know how well the wilson and the gambler aged. Still beauts
  • 1 0
 Would love one of those gamblers even today..
  • 1 0
 McDemo Long Lasting Bike For Me.
  • 1 0
 Pay to read articles now? Pass!!!
  • 1 0
 Had both the Tallboy LTc (in that yellow) and the V10. Awesome bikes!
  • 1 0
 Only just semi-retired my TB 1st Gen as my regular ride. Damn good bike.
  • 1 0
 Sooo many chainrings
  • 1 1
 The Redalp should have never been born in the first place!
  • 2 4
 This is like having sex with my mom.
  • 2 1
 Because the closest you ever got was in your imagination?
  • 4 7
 Who hired these engineers back then Silly looking bikes
  • 1 0
 They ain't nothing compared to the bike of 30 years ago. Everyone was trying all sorts of stuff and the designs were... how can I put this politely... unrestricted by conventional thought.
Below threshold threads are hidden







Copyright © 2000 - 2024. Pinkbike.com. All rights reserved.
dv65 0.048645
Mobile Version of Website