Mountain biking is an expensive sport, and for newcomers who have never really thought about the price of a decent bike that first trip to a local shop can be a real eye opener. “It costs how much?” is a constant refrain when someone sees the price of the latest carbon superbike, inevitably followed by “I could buy a (insert unrelated item here) for that much.”
Luckily, you don't need a bike that costs as much as a year's rent to have a good time on the trails – far from it. That's where the Value Field Test comes in. For this edition, we brought in three hardtails and three full-suspension options, all priced under $2,800 USD. That's still a decent chunk of money, but what you're getting for that price these days is better than ever.
Modern geometry has trickled down to even the most affordable options, and brake, drivetrain, and suspension technology continues to improve. All of the bikes shown below could serve as excellent starting points for riders who are starting to get serious about the sport, or even for already-addicted riders looking to upgrade an aging ride without breaking the bank.
The bulk of our testing took place in Squamish, BC. Conditions were on the rainier side of things, perfect for finding the limits of budget brake and tire traction. Rupert served as our main test track, and as you'll see in the videos, it has a good mix of rock slabs and roots, without getting
too crazy. It's a single black diamond trail that's extremely well built, and can be a good time on everything from a hardtail to an enduro bike.
Dario DiGiulioHeight: 6'3" / 191cm
Weight: 175 lb / 79.4 kg
Notes: Tech Editor, the king of customization.
Mike KazimerHeight: 5'11" / 180cm
Weight: 160 lb / 72.6 kg
Notes: Gear Director, serial cereal eater
Sarah MooreLocation: Squamish, BC
Height: 5'7" / 170 cm
Weight: 160 lb / 72.6 kg
Notes: Content Manager, maple syrup connoisseur
Reviews, the Huck to Flat, and more value bike content is on the way this week and next.
youtu.be/mbJ9iowQmU0?si=mqWwgeBmhEj7wCvU
@mikelevy - are ya out there buddy?
I get a little queasy every time I see bling bikes hitting 5 figures - but there are tons of DTC carbon full suspension bikes in the USD 3.5-4K range with really solid spec (mid-range suspension, solid wheels, good brakes, non-shitty drivetrains), and even lots of brick-and-mortar deals for only a little more. Back in 2015 when I was shopping, that amount of money got you alloy with entry level everything (and if you actually rode your bike a lot, you'd be swapping a lot of that stuff soon)
As for the bikes on test - I remember what $2,400 bought back in the early 2000s - man, we've come a long way in terms of value and performance.
I'd say the Covid-era bubble has definitely popped - and it's a pretty good time to buy bikes.
The Habit is a decent frame, but that recon fork is hot garbage.
I've opined before...using a Recon is like bolting a worn-out sofa to the front of your bike.
The Jeffsy Core 1 is $1,800. The Core 4 with GX Transmission is just $3,600, and the Core 5 with Fox Factory suspension and an X01 Transmission drivetrain is $4,400.
That price/value ratio is so excellent right now that it makes me a little sad no-one in my family needs a bike at this moment.
Heck, at those prices you could get a well-equipped Capra and an Izzo and have the right bike for almost anything, for the same price as a midrange "quiver killer" bike from another manufacturer.
www.bikesonline.com/polygon-collosus-n7-enduro-mountain-bike
On the spectral for example if that bolt loosens, It destroys the bushing instantly.
My nephew has the collosus and its built like an absolute tank. the seatstay to shock interface is Extremely stiff.
Flex stays aren't universally bad if done in Steel, Titanium, or Carbon, but aluminum is NOT a good material for repeated and concentrated fatigue.
since release and its been an absolute tank... beautiful Quality.
m.pinkbike.com/news/review-3-of-the-latest-burly-tailgate-pads-fox-dakine-send-it.html
but I'd really watch a $4k-$8k test at some point.
The end of year field test is generally high end stuff because we're looking at 2025 models, and brands are loathe to arrange mid-range specs for media samples. These are usually unreleased bikes at the time we are testing, so it's not like we could even go and buy mid-range at a store.
As I said in the first place, I'm watching and enjoying anyways.
Never intended that to be shit talking. Just pointing out most buyers are in the middle somewhere and most content pink bike or anywhere else is either value bike or top end bike. I'd definitely be interested if the brands see that in their sales numbers or if it shows something else though.
Excited for the field test, though!
Yeah I got that
I'd say any one of these bikes are a great value......
@pmhobson: *if and by the time current inventory clears. Probz I should be more concerned over the 'downward pressure' of USA national debt...
@chriskneeland: an example would have been nice
honestly, if you are taking longer, slacker, lower bikes to trails you are crushing with conservative geo, you likely aren't going to improve your strava times.
Also nice to see some color in the lineup. The monochrome or murdered look is played and tired. Reminds me of the 1930's pictures of Russians.
Think about it…
You can get a Carrera Valour from Halfords for £300
Let's see a true value field test PB and get them shredding hard.
www.halfords.com/bikes/mountain-bikes/carrera-valour-disc-mens-mountain-bike---silver---xs-s-m-l-xl-frames-504814.html?_gl=1*17ly9nm*_up*MQ..&gclid=CjwKCAjwr7ayBhAPEiwA6EIGxK3869N75S2Trbw24h4YYguXhbgKNsayFLg2yCvNHAgACkdh3hEsmxoCsLUQAvD_BwE&gclsrc=aw.ds
What bikes would you want to see in there?
Start with a basic frame like a Rockhopper or Giant Talon.
As for being picky with your dollars, I think it's a lot harder to do that in the ultra-value space. I make a personal choice not to buy big box stuff where I can, but I hate that we turn our noses up at truly cheap bikes. Like, I get it, but it's also all that some people can afford and I don't want to put up barriers for kids from low income households getting into the sport.
Those folks would be way better off with an old one of those vs. a new Walmart bike of equal price.
It was the one that RC raced (when he didn't win) Hardline, and the one he crashed spectacularly too.
It's pretty much untouched since he raced it in 2016 and has served me well. If I upgraded the bike I would probably go no faster this weekend at Fort William, with age comes a known comfort speed, the bike might make a 2s difference on a run but that's about it if I spent 4 to 5k on a new bike. Don't think it's worth the outlay at my age and for a few races a year.
(I paid £1k1 for tallboy, £1k3 for my slightly beaten up orbea eeb, £120 for my CX bike, £100 for my road bike, hunting bargains takes time though).
Finicky $2500 bikes are not for newbies.
There was a clearly visible sticker on the frame saying that bike wasn't meant to be used off the pavement. So really some of these bikes aren't mountain bike but just MTB shaped road/city bikes. Like most SUVs nowadays aren't more capable than the regular hatchback off pavement.
I am curious to see where this goes. I understand the value to someone who already owns a $500 bike and is more likely to perform incremental upgrades, but wonder if starting with a $500 bike plus $500 upgrades ends up anywhere close to a $1000 bike? Marin SQ1 comes to mind for a good value, I'm sure there are others.
Also taking into account that someone with a $500 bike is less likely to have the comfort level to perform upgrades at home - Are shop rates taken into account with the upgrades?
Sorry to complicate the matter, I think this will be a fun exercise no matter how you handle it!
The Marin Rift Zone 2 29" would fit right in this set of bikes: www.marinbikes.com/bikes/2024-rift-zone-29-2
Long travel hardtails can be fun but are definitely kind of silly on a performance side after a certain price point. But of course if you enjoy it, I'm all for silly bikes!