Recently, Vorsprung Suspension published a pretty interesting video making the case that shocks with a clevis link (above) or trunnion mount (right) could potentially accelerate wear due to the lateral loads the shock experiences when the frame flexes. Trunnion-mounted shocks connect to the frame with two widely-spaced bearings, making for a stiff connection. This means any lateral movement at the other end has to be accommodated by the shock bending. Clevis links increase the leverage over the shock, meaning a given lateral force is more likely to cause the shock to buckle or bind, making it unable to absorb bumps, or leading to the shock wearing out or even breaking.
Personally, I've seen several shocks misaligned in the frame, and sometimes visibly move side-to-side as the frame flexes. This does seem to reduce sensitivity, but I've only ever had two shocks fail - one was the notorious first-generation Cane Creek Inline DBair, and another was a first-generation Fox Float X2. In more recent years, however, shocks seem to hold up pretty well in my experience.
Trawling the PB forums, there are a few horror stories of broken shocks, but is it all that common?
What do you think?
By "UNIVERSAL" do you mean the 803-00-142 air sleeve kit? That won't really solve any issues other than maybe an air leak. Air leaks are super rare.
I think the poll should perhaps say "have you had a shock fail in significantly less time than the manufacturer's service interval, or in some manner (eg snapping a shaft) that is not related to maintenance of the shock" if the goal is to discern whether or not the frame has a significant influence.
With that said, seals are wearing items like tyres or chains or anything else - if they simply fail because they're worn out after a reasonable period of time, that's a different issue and generally not a design problem. If your trunnion mounted shock "suddenly" started leaking after 200hrs of riding without service, that's probably not related to it being trunnion mounted, and more related to the amount of normal wear the seals will see over that time. Did the frame cause it? Have you landed sideways hard enough to bend your frame out of alignment without noticing? Did the shock manufacturer's QC cause it? Did poor design of the shock cause it? Did you point a pressure washer at your bike and ram a ton of dirt and water into the seals? Do you frequently ride in moon dust or mud? All these things could be some or all of the cause. Frames are a significant part of it but they aren't the whole picture.
It is worth noting that we see a biased sample - we see tons of the broken stuff, but we don't really know what percentage of the bikes out there that pertains to. As it currently stands though, according to the poll it seems like at least 1/3 of people here have damaged a shock in a way that is "not able to be fixed with oil & seals". Whether that means you also needed a new damper body due to some wear/scoring from dirt ingress, or you snapped a shaft/eyelet, or broke a shim inside has not been specified by that.
Fork angle gave ton of confidence, was like riding a hardtail but with a touch of smooth.
As for the poll: I think its more about the influence of frame flex and trunnion, so i dont see a stuck down shock or oil spill etc as a failure. It is very hard to tell where the problem lies with issues like these. It can always be something wrong with the shock manufacturing, maintenance etc.
Only with a catastrophic falure like a broken shock as in the pictures you can really be sure it had at least something to do with the side loading. I definetly dont see a stuck down shock as a failure. I also had a shock show significant wear on the stanchion, but i am not sure it was because of the linkage, could have just been to much dirt ingress and not enough service or something like that
It doesnt really matter though, to really prove the effects of flex you would have to do a big study comparing different frames and mounting options. I guess then you could also include all kinds of failure as manufacturing and maintenance could be neglected with a big sample group and the only other variable being the frame/mounting and maybe riding style
Regarding the frame design, we also suspect that frames that are too stiff are bad for the shocks because the shocks have to take all the load. One example would be the Pivot Firebird with a Float X2. We had several customers with this combo who all complained about air loss on the trail. No mather how we serviced it, it always came back. They all run different shocks now, mostly coils and have no problems anymore.
Also imo, the X2’s are by far the best feeling air shock on the market currently when they’re in tip-top shape. But I always found them to require way more maintenance than other air shocks (even compared to a float X on my other bike) to keep them feeling that way.
The stiff frame would only be an issue if the linkages were un-stiff,
thus transmitting all lateral loads into the linkage, and in turn, the shock.
Pivot's upper linkage seems pretty compact/stout.
Maybe the orientation of the FloatX2 in the frame (canister down)
is preventing relubration of the seal, and thus early failure?
Also, sidenote, I personally feel that 29" wheels put more torque on a frame (and fork for that matter),
due to the larger diameter, and longer chainstays.
Be curious ot know if a model that can be set up in both MX and 29 configurations
sees greater/less wear in one of the setups.
This is why flexy frames like the steel Starlling Murmur doesn't actually wear shocks out, even when the frames are poorly aligned (almost as if they were welded up in some bloke's backyard shed).
It's actually part of the reason usually I hang my bike by the front wheel, or leave it upside down for a bit before a ride if I got lazy and just leaned it in the basement: get some oil up to the top of the fork lowers and shock (although my shock normally sits with the seals down, hanging puts it more vertical)
Ultimately that force has to go somewhere.
By intentionally increasing the stiffness of each element,
frame/component manufacturers are unintenionally redirecting that load
to the weakest/most sensitive point, which is internals of the shock.
Cars have bushings on the upper and lower shock mounts.
I'm surprised noone is making an aftermarket shock-mount bushing kit
that are some sort of rubber. (please direct me to it if they are)
Enve's recent reduction of their MTB rim profile (and thus rim stiffness)
in the face of competition's (arguabily, naturally) superior ride quality and durability,
could be seen as a nod to the usefulness of targeted flexibility.
But there are a whole lot of people who just want to get on their bike and go ride it, and have no idea what caused their shock to break, they just know that they got on their bike and their shock broke.
And suspension mfg's have to be super careful with wording when explaining it to people (and generally opt to dance around the issue), because the last thing they want to do is piss off their OEM customers by telling somebody who's shock just broke that "it's your bike companies fault because they made a poorly aligned frame, take it up with them."
This isn't precisely what we're saying - it's not lateral force or lateral misalignment that causes issues with clevises, it's just that the eye to eye length is so much longer for no increase in bending rigidity that they are inherently less able to resist buckling. Get a 30cm/1ft metal ruler and compress it lengthways between your two hands and watch it buckle easily. Cut a 5cm/2" segment and try the same with that piece and see if you can get it to buckle.
Bring on the 2018 Enduro and after 2 years or so, the Monarch Plus failed internally with a tiny crack in the adonized damper shaft. No warranty and no spares available from SRAM. I now have a second hand Ohlins STx22 - also a problematic shock but since a service has been great. It has a steel damper shaft and I suspect this won't develop a crack like the Monarch Plus. It may leak some air again, but at least its serviceable.
I've had two different DHX2's blow seals within 6 months of being brand new in the last year.
Can't believe it's 2022 and we're still dealing with this embarrassing issue so often.
Edit: Serving a damper/air can rarely would have anything to do with a structural failure of an eyelet or body either. Pretty much irrelevant.
Also, thanks for update on Fox: my two damper failures were on older versions of the Float CTD, which required Nitro. Don't you need a shock pump that goes to like 400psi to recharge a shock with air though? Afraid mine only goes to 250psi.
2019 Stumpjumper Comp Alloy. Jacked the DPS at least twice. Fox said they'd never seen some of the damage on the internals like I'd done. Then I decided to go with a coil, so I got a Marz CR coil. I blew up two of those before Fox decided that the CR and the Stumpy don't agree with each other and asked if I would take a Factory DPX2 instead as a replacement fo the Bomber CR. I agree and I've been happy with that shock ever since.
I've also had multiple issues with my fork when it was a 34, but since I upgraded to a 36, it's been all good.
Moral of the story: 200+ pounds and laps at Angelfire don't always mix on a medium travel bike.
Might be time to lose some weight.
Oh, I found it:
www.instagram.com/reel/CYt7SM8F-y-/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link
Lulz
How’s that for badassery?
RockShox SD Coil: once in 3 years of ownership, leaked from the reservoir
RS Monarch / Monarch Plus: about once every other year, scratches on the body, sucked air in
Fox X2: none so far in 5 months of ownership, we´ll see...
Fox DPS: none in 3 years of ownership, XC bike though
And that for a sub 70kg rider...
Same rate for droppers btw.
Forks all creak in the crown after half a year, only cure is pressing the steerer out and pressing it back in with loctite.
so i prefer to not answer at all lol
Time to send the coil to Push. Jinx removal is part of the yearly service right guys?
www.ridefox.com/fox17/help.php?m=bike&id=1138
They're not too specific but lateral force seems to be an issue.
And what can potentially break a coil shock might lead to extra wear in an air shock. The Monarch (+) seemed to have some issues at least.
Glad I didn’t sell the X2 that came with my Rune.
but to be clear the R3ACT suspension (polygon/marin) really really sideloaded the crap out of shocks.
with trunnion shocks it will be the frame manufacturers design responsibility to limit the flex at the shock (which is normally very close to the seat tube pivots anyhow).
Forget about sideloading causing failure, it also increases friction and stiction and will make the bike harsh. Its a lose lose for a bike to sideload the shocks and if a frame manufacturer overlooks it; the bike will be a poor performer.
I will never buy a Fox product again.
Do Rockshox Nude shocks also need expensive services from Fox factory only?
Sorry to the Scott fanboys I've apparently enraged. Doesn't bother me though. I'm positive they'll run into issues with their bike soon enough and they'll understand after that.
Luckily for me they were forthcoming on warranty and honestly a pleasure to work with to get the issue resolved; a new frame and shock and i did the rebuild myself.
www.pinkbike.com/photo/18873752
Said brand quickly ditched all the proprietary crap, thankfully! I've avoided yokes ever since, but never had an issue with trunnion shocks!
1x Fox DPS on an Enduro 29 with direct mount yoke (awful wear to shock body)
1x RS Monarch (premature wear)
1x Fox Float X2 going all mushy quite quickly (technical term) but fixed with service
1x Cane Creek Coil Inline needing remedial work for top out noise (I know it's not a "failure" but included anyway)
No examples of what are supposed to be the most damaging architectures?
for example some S fries re not compatible with certain coil shocks basically due to yoke design that will cause excessive force
It seems paring things down to have a headline grabbing weight is popular……till it breaks
Fork bushings, blown dampers and creaking csu’s too. Bikes are fun but not cheap.
Too bad they still aren’t producing anything for bikes weighing less than 50lbs, was good no nonsense bit of kit.
Marzocchi bomber CR - self disassembled after first bikepark - garbage .
RS any coil / x-fusion any coil - this is the only stuff which works in long-term.
And now....well....on a hardtail until my back says it's enough.
By that time shock issues will be a thing of the past, and we'll all have flying cars, right?
Ruben Torenbeek will happily tell you what he thinks about Trunnion…
I mean, when bike designers hate it and know it sucks. But still kinda forced to use it. Bad situation.
Zero problems with Cane Creek DB Air and Coil
And EXT
Same with cars. Some people literally don't touch their cars. Madness.
. never
. never
. What is this "service" you speak of?
At least that's what I clicked
Then got a Reign and put a DVO on it. Aircan blew right off on a shock with a couple dozen rides.
If you ride hard, shocks die.