WELCOME TO THE 2022 PINKBIKE
ENDURO BIKE FIELD TEST
7 New Enduro Bikes
Words by Mike Levy, photography by Dave Trumpore
We've done a lot of Field Tests by this point, and while all of them are interesting in their own way, from value performance to short-travel trail bikes, it's the enduro edition that usually garners the most interest. That makes all the sense in the world when you consider how capable and well-rounded these long-travel bikes have become, but also because it's often where we see some exciting out-of-the-box thinking. Sure, they need to descend well, of course, but as our test fleet proves, there are a whole bunch of different ways to get that job done.
This time around we've got seven of the latest and most interesting examples, from ultra-rare steel that's welded in the US to all the carbon fiber to an aluminum bike that punches well above its price tag.
While the short-travel and value-minded Field Tests we do are great and all, can we agree that it's the enduro bike episodes that are the most interesting? Modern enduro bikes are wildly capable machines that seem too long, too slack, and too soft to ever impress us on a climb but, as these seven examples showed us, that's far from the case. Instead, most offer impressively well-rounded performance that won't drain your soul over a 4,000ft climb but also all the downhill performance you could ever ask for on the way back down.
But each of these seven bikes does that a little differently, from the terrain-leveling Contra to the do-it-all La Sal Peak.
How Do We Choose the Bikes?
Unlike some of our other Field Tests where the categories can be a bit hazy, it's pretty straightforward when it comes to the criteria for this round: they just need to be enduro bikes. But beyond that, we always want to be testing the newest and most interesting machines, and I think that Kazimer has done a good job on that front.
The new Megatower, Meta SX, Fezzari, and Patrol Carbon are safe bets if you're looking for a new bike that's sure to check all the enduro boxes, but what if you want something a bit more exotic and a lot less common?
Intense's very red Tracer might be just the ticket, while Contra's wild-looking MC, a steel virtual high-pivot bike with all the chain and the best rootbeer paint job ever, is sure to turn some heads. And if you want your high-pivot idler bike in carbon fiber, we've also got the new Deviate Claymore to compare to the US-made Contra; which one would you choose?
Yes, these bikes are really expensive, but that's why we also do our Value Bike Field Tests that see us focus on bang for your buck.
I bet you already know how these Field Tests go by now: laps, laps, and more back-to-back laps on our test bikes. Matt Beer, Alicia Leggett, and Mike Kazimer did exactly that for two weeks in Bellingham, interrupted only by burritos and swapping bikes to go do some more laps. Unlike our standard long-form written reviews, Field Tests are all about comparing the bikes to each other on the same terrain and trails, on the same day, and in the same conditions.
Staying on the 'same' theme, all of the bikes have been fitted with matching Continental Kryptotal tires front and back so that none are at an advantage just because it comes with stickier rubber. This way, we're thinking about handling and suspension performance rather than worrying about how a tire we don't have confidence in will handle that nasty section of wet off-camber roots.
And speaking of roots, big bikes deserve big terrain and that's exactly what they saw while being tested in Bellingham, Washington. While there was definitely some climbing to do, our focus was to point these bikes down terrain worthy of their suspension and geometry, so they saw plenty of steep lines, rough trails, and questionable decisions.
Enduro bikes are (mostly) designed for enduro racing, and even if the large majority of them never see a start line we still wanted to know which of our seven test rigs was the quickest when the clock was running. I'll always put more weight on subjective feedback if I'm honest, but a bike that feels fast isn't always fast, which is why we end up timing a whole bunch of our riding as well.
Impossible Climb, (No) Efficiency Test, & Huck to Flat
Let's be honest: we're all here to watch the Huck to Flat video. Sadly, you'll have to wait until we get through all the reviews to see Matt Beer bottom-out all these bikes in mega-slow-mo on a pancake-flat landing. In the meantime, we skipped the Efficiency Test this time around due to time constraints, and while I assume a lot of people will be sad to not have a riveting ten-minute video about pedaling efficiency to watch, you'll still get to see how these enduro machines fared on a wet and tricky Impossible Climb.
There are also the roundtable videos, of course, that see Kazimer, Matt, and Alicia answer some tough questions about which bikes they liked the most and which ones they liked the least.
Mike Kazimer, Alicia Leggett, and Matt Beer spent two weeks testing our seven enduro bikes in ideal PNW conditions: rain, mud, and plenty of wet rocks and roots to keep everyone on their toes. As always, testing was spread between all three of them so that we have different perspectives on how the bikes performed.
And while there's definitely some agreement about many things, the team also has differing takes on what they're looking for from an enduro bike and why (or why not) some make more sense than others for how they ride.
Matt BeerHeight: 5'10" / 178 cm
Weight: 170 lb / 77 kg
Notes: Tech editor, allergic to everything
Mike KazimerHeight: 5'11" / 180cm
Weight: 160 lbs / 72.6 kg
Notes: Managing tech editor, noted alien skeptic
Alicia LeggettHeight: 5'10" / 178 cm
Weight: 148 lb / 67 kg
Notes: News / tech / whatever editor
While this may come as a surprise to you, the truth is that I don't know how to use a video camera or iMovie. Thankfully, Satchel Cronk, Max Baron, Lear Miller, and Dave Trumpore not only know how to do that stuff, they know how to do it really well because we wouldn't have any of these videos or photos without them working roughly ten-times as hard as the people in front of the camera.
A Field Test series takes two to three weeks to film, but that's only half the battle - the videos still need to be edited, including removing all the gaffs and wrong things that I said, which takes weeks of work in a small dungeon lit by a single lightbulb at PB HQ.
Which bikes are you most interested in?
The 2022 Enduro Bike Field Test was made possible thanks to Rapha and POC, and thanks to Continental for supplying control tires for all the bikes.
What a fun looking bike!
I do wish PB would give Canfield, Banshee, and Knolly some more ink in these reviews. I feel like they either pick very mainstream brands, or some boutique manufacturer who is working out of a garage in Lichtenstein.
How much you pay for the new bike?
10,000 dollars?
Is too much
It no good.
I love my local shops, but bike companies are cutting them off at the knees with the lack of warranty support.
The prices on that Commencal are "currently" a bunch off. The Ohlins/full XT one on the European website is 4800 Euro without VAT. They'll ship it to you for like $250. The USD to EUR conversion is 1.01 right now. For like $5100 you can get the best one they sell to your door. Learn how to play exchange rate disparities people. Even ordering from the US site... the full Fox Factory/XT one AND the Ohlins/XT one are $6000.
I mean , I cracked my v10 iscg tab because I suck and Santa Cruz didn’t even question it and replaced the front triangle. Call me a fanboy , I’m good with that
all they had to do was drop the reach and go 435 ish with the chainstay's. making sure they decrease the front centre to re-weight the front wheel(if they intend on keeping the slack as HTA)
The SX still feels weird to ride, I own both the AM and SX framesets in large. I always wanted a 475/480 reach AM.
The still SX has the same feeling you get with the AM which is similar to the way the Sentinel rides, you need to sit on the bar to get any proper grip when hauling ass on anything thats not double black
Saved me the cost of buying a custom headset LoL
Having to ask the price or not is irrelevant if someone is trying to do a complete comparison between different bikes.
Or at the very least get to some level of parity. Either with all the bikes costing the same (so that value can be compared) or with all the bikes being equipped with the same parts (to purely compare frame design, geometry and suspension performance).
Which is fine. They need income from somewhere, and god knows most of the people on this website are about as likely to pay for content as they are likely to shoot themselves in the kneecap on purpose.
Look for honesty in the margins, and look for entertainment in the article.
@William42, that's one way to look at it, or the less jaded way would be to consider that we're reviewing new bikes so that potential buyers have an idea of the pros / cons before shelling out their hard-earned dollars.
Are this year's bikes drastically better than those from last year or the year before? In some cases, yes, but in other instances it's more of an incremental change. That's why we have comparison sections in our reviews, and try to mention what changes have made a noticeable difference.
Don't know how you can get so many down votes for just speaking the 100% TRUTH! I love it when I have to click "show comment" to see a comment that has so many down votes, you better believe I am going to click on that! HAHAHAHA.
I am guessing everyone that DOWN VOTED YOU wither works for Pinkbike, or they work for the Bicycle Industry, or they are just plain BLIND FANBOIS.
None of us should blame Pinkbike for being an Advertising Agency, they set up shop to make money, and NOT to give it away. ALL OF us work and are in business to make money.
Since none of us pay for all the great content that Pinkbike provides, we should be grateful for Pinkbike. Pinkbike needs to do and say whatever so they can get bigger paychecks, because they too need lavish vacations and Ferraris.
I will say, to me Pinkbike does provide a lot more useful information than they do SALES PITCH. Also most of the time, the stuff they promote is worth at the very least looking into. Pinkbike is my 1 stop shop source for everything Mountain Bike Related.
Honestly, it would be awesome to see on so many product tests. How does an air or coil shock hold up when you're pushing the PSI limits or running the max spring weight? How do those side lugs hold up to hard cornering when you're 230lbs? Will those tires still provide some grip on that rock slab when the PSI is bumped up? Frames X, Y, and Z might be offered in XXL, but do they retain the same kind of stiffness as the wheelbase gets longer? Those carbon bars might be too stiff for the 160lb rider, but what about the 240lb rider?
Obviously all testing is subjective, but it would be cool to see a bit more representation for the big dudes.
I do think it would be a really fun feature to find some bigger testers and choose a couple of bikes that seem like they would be most susceptible to differences across rider size (frames particularly stiff/flexy, heavy, or with notably different frontend to backend ratios between sizes).
Even if it's not a bunch of different frames, I think it would be cool to have a feature where one big dude does a long term test and swaps a bunch of different parts (shocks, forks, bars, wheels, tires, etc) to see how they hold up and perform under a larger rider.
@unrooted:
peace
And I will hazard a guess that you are a short tiny person.
Heavier doesn't mean stronger. Big guys want performance as well and (for the most part), we don't know what still performs under bigger dudes. Those carbon wheels that are "too stiff and not compliant enough" under a 160lb rider might be perfect for a larger rider, but do I want to drop $2k on a guess? If I'm looking to upgrade my brakes, are there options that give me some modulation along with all the power? The opinion of a 170lb rider means almost nothing to me.
I get that the feel and performance of all parts is pretty subjective, but it would be nice to have SOMETHING to work with.
I'm losing weight just to make buying bikes easier. I'm finding being under 190 makes tuning your average bike easier.
Jordie Lunn was 5'10" and 205. He was fit and built. Someone built like him could take a bike way closer to it's limits.
Speaking of which Craig Lunn would be an awesome reviewer. He raced when he was younger, bikes road religiously and still rips up trails. he'd be amazing on the impossible climb (puts down watts and has serious technical chops) and he'll ride anything down (I've seen him on double blacks, I assume he wouldn't shy from pro lines). That being said I'm pretty sure he's sub 200lb (but still more than either of the Mike's).
Personally I am lucky enough to stay under 250 lbs and actually be on the tables for products at the edge of the cutoff. Totally sucks for those pushing 275-300 that the industry basically ignores their existence. I realize it is a niche market but it does exist.
I know plenty of people that would be "overweight" by BMI that are fit. When I worked a nightclub nearly every bouncer would have been "oerweight" by BMI, some actually had cardiovascular fitness in addition to muscle.
One of my buddies does around 1600m elevation of pnw singletrack a week in the pnw and hovers around 200lb (that's a normal work week, bike trips would be significantly more). While that's not "I review bikes for a living" level biking, that's also not your avg weekend warrior. And again, Jordie Lunn. If he was still alive I'd love to see him smashing on all the enduro bikes. Imagine him doing huck to flat.
Im sure the Patrol is going to hold its own in this comparison, but I can already see that the Float X shock (again GX build) is going to come up short in some situations compared to all of the X2 equipped bikes.
Actually, both of the mullet bikes have "trail bike" shocks... so I'm not sure we will have clear answers to the mullet v. full 29er debate either.
Saved 3+ pounds over the Guerrilla Gravity Pistola I was on which had ~25mm less travel…
Loving it! But the reach could be a little longer.
Also I wish they had an alum version of the new tracer for a rad park build so that you wouldn't have to worry about the carbon as much.
650b being 27.5 is irrelevant since the "twenty-seven and a half inches" is 100% marketing and isn't even an approximation of size.
@Balgaroth Saying that a review for one frame size only holds up for that frame size isn't true or accurate. Yeah on the XS and XXL sizes it might be a bit different (see previous comments on outliers) but it's going to be similar across the majority of the sizes.
- I recently tried a bike that has 10mm extra reach and slacker HA compared to mine with 10mm less CS length, so while the overall size of the bike was roughly the same, that bike was terrible to corner, 2 brothers own the same bike in the same size and both complained the bike was hard to corner from day one, ratio of said bike is around 1.90, mini 1.80.
- I added an angleset to my girlfriend Liv Hail going from 66HA to 64HA, she is riding a size S on which she is very comfortable. She isn't a bike nerds like me so didn't know what to expect. First spin with the bike she immediately complained that her bike wasn't turning as well anymore. Her ratio went from 1.66 to 1.74, imagine if she had to ride a bike with a 1.90 ratio she would have killed me.
Having a good ratio allows you to have the benefits of a long front end to not go OTB in the steep and loading the front tire while still having a bike that corners well. And there is no reasons aside from bike brands lazyness that all bike sizes couldn't benefit from the same balance ratio.
Last fun fact, one of the bike that was deemed the best cornering bike of its time was the 222 (non-evo) which had a ratio somewhere around 1.6 in size L.
Stable as a monster truck, still handsome - and it climbs good.
This is probably why i love this machine.
Are you guys who need longer chainstays lighter riders? What about leg length? The PB riders that love longer rears are all relatively longer-legged, light people. I'm wondering if that has something to do with it.
It's my new pet theory, because I physically can't stand chainstays >435 mm, but like a reach of 475-490mm.
Steve explains what's wrong with some bikes im corners:
m.youtube.com/watch?v=i5R60JHJbxI
My Spindrift has exactly the 445mm CS and i took a size M with a 50mm stem because of the balance and the weight on the front.
I'm never arguing for companies not to make 450+ CS bikes, just that not every bike with a long reach needs long stays.
Still glad he's working on it, not trying to be dismissive.
As an example I am always trying to search for more close ratio between the shock stroke and rearwheel travel. I imagine that frame has its limits when shock stroke is 50mm with 170mm rearwheel travel when I want to set up the airpressure/spring weight. I would be more than curious what look for in other aspects as well to get out the max of a bike as on outlier.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Hot_Catholic_Love
So WTAF with the weights these days? Honestly asking.
e.g. the Fox 38 is over half a pound heavier than the 36. Enduro casing tires are about half a pound heavier each than their trail casing siblings. It adds up quick but you pay that price to go quicker back down.
Strong, light, cheap. Pick two. Barring a revolutionary change in material science or significant, quantum leap forward in innovation, this has always has been the axiom.
Also, where is the Grim Donut?
Maybe there's a few customers out there who need to have top of the line parts (AXS, Fox Factory, etc), but can't afford other brands $10k bikes?
Nothing on the paint. Nothing on them being discounted. Only one comment on how they’re not made in the USA out of aluminum. Get it together Intense, pinkbike should be way more emotional over the new Tracer?
1. The more common 'top of the downtube' sandwich box kinda makes your frame look like Tupperware. Under the downtube does have better aesthetics.
2. I take tools and a tube on every ride and almost never use them. Due to frequency of use, access isn't really an issue. If I flat and need a tube and a pump, there's a good chance the bike is going upside down. Now the under frame storage access point is exactly where I need it.
3. That's a part of the frame that can take a beating. If there's damage then I've compromised a $30 cover and not a $3.5k frame.
4. It provides internal frame access in an area that can be problematic for cable routing. I've had to pull BB's to run a dropper and this would presumably address that.
5. Keeps the extra weight of tools at the lowest point of the frame.
6. Easy to clean out the inside of your frame if you ride in the mud and wet.
So I'm not sure that it works as effective storage for snacks and a cellphone but beyond that I've talked myself into it.
I'm sure they didn't include it just because the Supre Drive most likely doesn't hold it's own (yet) against established drivtrain systems and they probably didn't want to ruin Cedrics party.
I will say that I know it's not the focus, but I do really care about how these bike climb. I live a mile or two from a trail system with some rough and nasty stuff even on certain cross country trails (Bootleg Canyon outside of Vegas), so when I upgrade from/add to my first gen Bronson, I'd consider an enduro bike like these, but I still like to ride up the singletrack rather than shuttle/grind up the road when I can.
Other bikes I’ve owned are faster on a gravel/fire road climb, but the Highlander absolutely kills singletrack climbs, IMO.
Maybe just weigh the frames with shock to keep it simple? Everything else just muddys the waters
Separate test for all the hi pivots, followed by a test pitting the best hi pivots vs the best non high pivot.
Would rather see the Cannondale Jekyll and maybe an Evil or any other bike that people may actually buy?
A contra, Fezzari or a Deviate?? How many of those have you ever seen or will ever see?
I am so confused!
Is the frame really that bad on a Cube?
www.cube.eu/en/2022/bikes/mountainbike/fullsuspension/stereo-one77/cube-stereo-one77-race-29-desertngrey
As for the paint finish, this color shifting wet paint job, although beautiful, is not at all durable. The local powder coaters were moving locations when this bike needed a paint job so I went with wet paint on this bike from a local frame painter. The production frames are all powder coated, which provides a way more durable finish.
Looking forward to seeing (maybe test riding) these in the wild in their tidier final form.
If PB could just test aaaaalll the FS bikes currently available
aaaand report back to us , which one is the absolute best of the bunch, I think we’d all be good
I mean pfhhh
that’s all we’re really asking right?
welp there ya go problem solved
I’ll get my coat
At this point (they just reviewed the megaplower) its one of the high pivots... come on homemade steel contraption!
Here's an idea, take a leaf out of the Semanuk book and do a continuous shot field test video........
Maybe they’re giving it the solo, long form review?!
Enduro has been around for a long time and we've tested it and talked about it a lot.
hence the aggressive anti squat in those bikes, Single pivot with low progression but heaps of anti squat make for a weird mix.
Should have called it the dirtbox
m.pinkbike.com/forum/listcomments/?threadid=235756
Haven't tried it, but maybe the best way to test it would be to have identical long travel bikes, one with the o-chain. Run the suspension soft on both to see if you can feel the difference between them after many runs. Some people swear by it, others not so much. It probably makes a difference but might not necessarily make you faster.
Am I doing it right?
It’s now far more discreet than the last time a Fezzari bike was reviewed so they did actually take heed of the comments.
As for "They sell bikes anyway" - You do realize this test has a Santa Cruz?
They also have the stupidest headset system that flexes all over the show and grinds into the fork steerer.
The CF headsets are a joke as they've tried to save money by using the Ebikes headset mandrill, upper is52 headsets are pathetic, i get why - in theory the headtube is stronger due to how massive the bearing load is spread compared to say a zs44.(most common upper), but Canyon were never known for headtube issues and thats usally easily worked around with a much thicker design.
Really disappointed, but for the spec my Torque CF7 is >$1.5k cheaper than most other comparable bikes so I kept it :/
Aside from needing to tighten some things and ship a bike back the rest is all cosmetic. The bike rides solid otherwise. Hard to say if I would do it again. That headset is such a turn off though.
I recently bought a Torque AL and purely in terms of descending performance it's the best bike I ever owned by a longshot. Although truth be told I wasn't totally happy about the state the bike arrived in at my house. But the Canyon support was beyond awesome. Sorted things out quickly, professionally and generously.
10/10 would buy again, especially since comparable bikes from other brands are easily 1.5k€ more expensive.
@mikelevy
www.pinkbike.com/u/seb-stott/blog/in-depth-review-forbidden-dreadnought.html
www.pinkbike.com/news/review-2022-devinci-spartan-hp.html
We put a lot of time and effort into making these, and hopefully they provide some insight into the pros / cons of each bike, with some alien jokes thrown into the mix.
I had a -1.5° headset installed but the seat tube angle still sucked. Then unfortunately the left seatstay cracked in a compression but it was warrantied.
Bummer there's not a least one 27.5 bike, mullet is not the same...
Bike companies would be clamoring for exposure like this, so you’re saying that there’s no inside line, you guys just sorta “pick at random”.
… and Outside doesn’t insist on profiting from this venture?
Uh huh.